MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7015472680

Studio One celebrates 25 year anniversary

2013· article· en· W7015472680 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueFilm in Education and Therapy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStudioCredibilityQuality (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Center (category theory)Work (physics)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Studio One celebrates 25 year anniversary It never hurts to ask. That approach created a television program produced by students and UND Television Center staff that has spanned a quarter of a century. The program is called Studio One, a name first scrawled on a napkin that was chosen for its ability to fit any format. The show was created because a UND student named Tom Buehring had a request. His request in 1986 to the Director of the Television Center, Barry Brode, was for a show that was professional at its core. He wanted something that an outside professional organization would look at with merit. There was nothing like it on campus. Planning started in spring of '86 and the program launched in February, 1987. Together, Buehring and Brode assembled a team of students, faculty and staff to develop the show. The first live telecast aired on Feb. 5, 1987. Now, more than 800 students have participated in the program gaining valuable skills in teamwork, professionalism, producing quality work and communication. You would be hard pressed to find another program like Studio One in the nation. The unique blend of student empowerment, real world credibility and attention to quality is rare in shows originating from a university campus. Open to all majors, it centers on business principles that help students gain experience that translates into skills, overreaching simply how to produce a television show. The program's themes center on professionalism, teamwork, quality and communication. Control Room (1992): Studio One was first produced in Robertson Hall, one of the oldest buildings on campus. Studio One has since moved to the new Skalicky Tech Incubator UND Television Center Director Barry Brode explains one of the greatest achievements is the progress the program has made through the years. "When we started the program 25 years ago, we never anticipated the alumni network that would form," said Brode. "Now, with so many of our alumni in hiring positions, it's a great opportunity for our interns to connect with them. Our alumni know what's expected of students who participate in the program and that can benefit our interns who are entering the job market." Studio One has achieved many milestones in the last 25 years, including more 663 regional and national awards. For the 2012-13 academic year, Studio One received 12 regional awards and 31 North Dakota Professional Communicators awards for the show and student work. Reporter and news anchor, Ali Strand, won first place in the nation from the Society of Professional Journalists. Her story about a nonprofit ranch that uses horses to help change lives advanced from the regional to national competition and won. Studio One (2013): Since the creation of Studio One in the mid-80s, individual students and the show have received numerous awards, and more than 800 alumni have worked on the project in the past 25 years. The show can be seen across the Midwest and in southern Manitoba. As part of the UND Spirit Campaign, Studio One awarded their first scholarship to intern Brian Gendreau last fall. This semester's scholarship went to current Studio One co-anchor, Anne Hook. In addition to playing in North Dakota markets, the program also plays across the Midwest and in Winnipeg. "We look forward to expanding into new markets in the years to come," said Brode.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,045
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,054
Tête enseignante GPT0,315
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Même sujetFilm in Education and TherapyTravaux en français237 207