MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015472680

Studio One celebrates 25 year anniversary

2013· article· en· W7015472680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFilm in Education and Therapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStudioCredibilityQuality (philosophy)Quarter (Canadian coin)Center (category theory)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studio One celebrates 25 year anniversary It never hurts to ask. That approach created a television program produced by students and UND Television Center staff that has spanned a quarter of a century. The program is called Studio One, a name first scrawled on a napkin that was chosen for its ability to fit any format. The show was created because a UND student named Tom Buehring had a request. His request in 1986 to the Director of the Television Center, Barry Brode, was for a show that was professional at its core. He wanted something that an outside professional organization would look at with merit. There was nothing like it on campus. Planning started in spring of '86 and the program launched in February, 1987. Together, Buehring and Brode assembled a team of students, faculty and staff to develop the show. The first live telecast aired on Feb. 5, 1987. Now, more than 800 students have participated in the program gaining valuable skills in teamwork, professionalism, producing quality work and communication. You would be hard pressed to find another program like Studio One in the nation. The unique blend of student empowerment, real world credibility and attention to quality is rare in shows originating from a university campus. Open to all majors, it centers on business principles that help students gain experience that translates into skills, overreaching simply how to produce a television show. The program's themes center on professionalism, teamwork, quality and communication. Control Room (1992): Studio One was first produced in Robertson Hall, one of the oldest buildings on campus. Studio One has since moved to the new Skalicky Tech Incubator UND Television Center Director Barry Brode explains one of the greatest achievements is the progress the program has made through the years. "When we started the program 25 years ago, we never anticipated the alumni network that would form," said Brode. "Now, with so many of our alumni in hiring positions, it's a great opportunity for our interns to connect with them. Our alumni know what's expected of students who participate in the program and that can benefit our interns who are entering the job market." Studio One has achieved many milestones in the last 25 years, including more 663 regional and national awards. For the 2012-13 academic year, Studio One received 12 regional awards and 31 North Dakota Professional Communicators awards for the show and student work. Reporter and news anchor, Ali Strand, won first place in the nation from the Society of Professional Journalists. Her story about a nonprofit ranch that uses horses to help change lives advanced from the regional to national competition and won. Studio One (2013): Since the creation of Studio One in the mid-80s, individual students and the show have received numerous awards, and more than 800 alumni have worked on the project in the past 25 years. The show can be seen across the Midwest and in southern Manitoba. As part of the UND Spirit Campaign, Studio One awarded their first scholarship to intern Brian Gendreau last fall. This semester's scholarship went to current Studio One co-anchor, Anne Hook. In addition to playing in North Dakota markets, the program also plays across the Midwest and in Winnipeg. "We look forward to expanding into new markets in the years to come," said Brode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota)Same topicFilm in Education and TherapyFrench-language works237,207