MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7018737232

Discriminative manifold learning for automatic speech recognition

2016· dissertation· en· W7018737232 sur OpenAlexafffund

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueFace and Expression Recognition
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesMcGill University
Mots-clésDiscriminative modelPattern recognition (psychology)Nonlinear dimensionality reductionManifold alignmentFeature vectorFeature (linguistics)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Linear discriminant analysisCurse of dimensionality
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Manifold learning techniques have received a lot of attention in recent literature. The underlying assumption of these techniques is that the high-dimensional data can be considered as a set of geometrically related points lying on or close to the surface of a smooth low-dimensional manifold embedded in the ambient space. These techniques have been used in a wide variety of application domains, such as face recognition, speaker and speech recognition. In automatic speech recognition (ASR), previous studies on this topic have primarily focused on unsupervised manifold learning techniques for dimensionality reducing feature space transformations. The goal of these techniques is to preserve the underlying manifold based geometrical relationship existing in the speech data during the transformation. However, these techniques fail to exploit the discriminative structure between the classes of speech sounds. The work in this thesis has investigated incorporating inter-class discrimination into manifold learning techniques. The contributions of this thesis work can be divided in two major categories. The first is the discriminative manifold learning (DML) techniques for dimensionality reducing feature space transformation. The second is to use the DML based constraints to regularize the training of deep neural networks (DNN). The first contribution of this thesis is a framework for DML based feature space transformations for ASR. These techniques attempt to preserve the local manifold based nonlinear relationships between feature vectors while maximizing a criterion related to separating speech classes. Two different techniques are proposed. The first is the locality preserving discriminant analysis (LPDA). In LPDA, the manifold domain relationships between feature vectors are characterized by a Euclidean distance based kernel. The second technique is the correlation preserving discriminant analysis (CPDA), which uses a cosine-correlational kernel. The LPDA and CPDA techniques are compared to two well known approaches for dimensionality reducing transformations, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and locality preserving projection (LPP), on two separate tasks involving noise corrupted utterances of both connected digits and read newspaper text. The proposed approaches are found to provide up to 30% reductions in word error rates (WER) with respect to LDA and LPP. The second major contribution of this thesis is to apply the DML based constraints to optimize the training of DNNs for ASR. DNNs have been successfully applied to a variety of ASR tasks, both in discriminative feature extraction and hybrid acoustic modeling scenarios. Despite the rapid progress in DNN research, a number of challenges remain in training DNNs. In this part of the thesis, a manifold regularized deep neural network (MRDNN) training approach is proposed that constrains the network learning to preserve the underlying manifold based relationships between speech feature vectors. This is achieved by incorporating manifold based locality preserving constraints in the objective criterion of the network. Empirical evidence is provided to demonstrate that training a network with manifold constraints strengthens the learning of manifold based neighborhood preservation and preserves structural compactness in the hidden layers of the network. The ASR WER obtained using these networks is evaluated on a connected digits speech in noise task and a read news speech in noise task. Compared to DNNs trained without manifold constraints, the MRDNNs provides 10 to 38.64% reductions in ASR WERs.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,915
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,003
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,261
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetFace and Expression RecognitionTravaux en français237 207