MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7018737232

Discriminative manifold learning for automatic speech recognition

2016· dissertation· en· W7018737232 on OpenAlexafffund

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2016
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsDiscriminative modelPattern recognition (psychology)Nonlinear dimensionality reductionManifold alignmentFeature vectorFeature (linguistics)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Linear discriminant analysisCurse of dimensionality
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manifold learning techniques have received a lot of attention in recent literature. The underlying assumption of these techniques is that the high-dimensional data can be considered as a set of geometrically related points lying on or close to the surface of a smooth low-dimensional manifold embedded in the ambient space. These techniques have been used in a wide variety of application domains, such as face recognition, speaker and speech recognition. In automatic speech recognition (ASR), previous studies on this topic have primarily focused on unsupervised manifold learning techniques for dimensionality reducing feature space transformations. The goal of these techniques is to preserve the underlying manifold based geometrical relationship existing in the speech data during the transformation. However, these techniques fail to exploit the discriminative structure between the classes of speech sounds. The work in this thesis has investigated incorporating inter-class discrimination into manifold learning techniques. The contributions of this thesis work can be divided in two major categories. The first is the discriminative manifold learning (DML) techniques for dimensionality reducing feature space transformation. The second is to use the DML based constraints to regularize the training of deep neural networks (DNN). The first contribution of this thesis is a framework for DML based feature space transformations for ASR. These techniques attempt to preserve the local manifold based nonlinear relationships between feature vectors while maximizing a criterion related to separating speech classes. Two different techniques are proposed. The first is the locality preserving discriminant analysis (LPDA). In LPDA, the manifold domain relationships between feature vectors are characterized by a Euclidean distance based kernel. The second technique is the correlation preserving discriminant analysis (CPDA), which uses a cosine-correlational kernel. The LPDA and CPDA techniques are compared to two well known approaches for dimensionality reducing transformations, linear discriminant analysis (LDA) and locality preserving projection (LPP), on two separate tasks involving noise corrupted utterances of both connected digits and read newspaper text. The proposed approaches are found to provide up to 30% reductions in word error rates (WER) with respect to LDA and LPP. The second major contribution of this thesis is to apply the DML based constraints to optimize the training of DNNs for ASR. DNNs have been successfully applied to a variety of ASR tasks, both in discriminative feature extraction and hybrid acoustic modeling scenarios. Despite the rapid progress in DNN research, a number of challenges remain in training DNNs. In this part of the thesis, a manifold regularized deep neural network (MRDNN) training approach is proposed that constrains the network learning to preserve the underlying manifold based relationships between speech feature vectors. This is achieved by incorporating manifold based locality preserving constraints in the objective criterion of the network. Empirical evidence is provided to demonstrate that training a network with manifold constraints strengthens the learning of manifold based neighborhood preservation and preserves structural compactness in the hidden layers of the network. The ASR WER obtained using these networks is evaluated on a connected digits speech in noise task and a read news speech in noise task. Compared to DNNs trained without manifold constraints, the MRDNNs provides 10 to 38.64% reductions in ASR WERs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicFace and Expression RecognitionFrench-language works237,207