How My Korean Immigrant Parents Talk To Me: A Thematic Analysis Of “Kim’s Convenience”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Previous studies have focused on the impact of family communication patterns and intergenerational conflict in traditional interpersonal communication or face-to-face settings. However, mediated portrayals of communication patterns of immigrants from different generations have not received much scholarly attention. With the rise of globalization and increasing levels of immigration to Western countries and the power of media messages in shaping worldviews and attitudes toward minority groups, it is important to conduct a closer examination of how intergenerational conflict existing in Asian immigrant families is depicted within Western media content. In this sense, this paper chooses a Canadian sitcom entitled “Kim’s Convenience” as the immediate resource of this research, which will shed light on the studies of family communication and intergenerational conflict. Existing studies have so far shed light on the exaggeration of Asian and Asian immigrant characters and its psychological and sociological implications on individuals while mediated portrayals of communication patterns of immigrants from different generations have not received much scholarly attention. Previous studies only examined how content regarding Asian immigrants and other minorities are treated in the context of Western media environment with an aim to look at the societal and psychological consequences of media content. Considering such circumstance, this paper explores how Asian immigrants and their intergenerational issues are portrayed in a Western comedy show. This paper involves a qualitative thematic analysis of the scripts of the first three seasons of the show. The investigation was aimed to: 1) uncover how this sitcom depicts intergenerational conflict between family members, and 2) identify ways in which the four Kim family members attempt to bridge intergenerational conflict within this specific sitcom. Results show that intergenerational conflicts within an immigrant family were created when the two generations have different social identities, expectations, stereotypes, and personalities and do not know how to communicate authentically. However, the results also demonstrate that conversations amongst family members, family bonding activities, conversation with those outside the family and reminiscing about the past together were the strategies used to overcome the difficulties mentioned above.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».