How My Korean Immigrant Parents Talk To Me: A Thematic Analysis Of “Kim’s Convenience”
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous studies have focused on the impact of family communication patterns and intergenerational conflict in traditional interpersonal communication or face-to-face settings. However, mediated portrayals of communication patterns of immigrants from different generations have not received much scholarly attention. With the rise of globalization and increasing levels of immigration to Western countries and the power of media messages in shaping worldviews and attitudes toward minority groups, it is important to conduct a closer examination of how intergenerational conflict existing in Asian immigrant families is depicted within Western media content. In this sense, this paper chooses a Canadian sitcom entitled “Kim’s Convenience” as the immediate resource of this research, which will shed light on the studies of family communication and intergenerational conflict. Existing studies have so far shed light on the exaggeration of Asian and Asian immigrant characters and its psychological and sociological implications on individuals while mediated portrayals of communication patterns of immigrants from different generations have not received much scholarly attention. Previous studies only examined how content regarding Asian immigrants and other minorities are treated in the context of Western media environment with an aim to look at the societal and psychological consequences of media content. Considering such circumstance, this paper explores how Asian immigrants and their intergenerational issues are portrayed in a Western comedy show. This paper involves a qualitative thematic analysis of the scripts of the first three seasons of the show. The investigation was aimed to: 1) uncover how this sitcom depicts intergenerational conflict between family members, and 2) identify ways in which the four Kim family members attempt to bridge intergenerational conflict within this specific sitcom. Results show that intergenerational conflicts within an immigrant family were created when the two generations have different social identities, expectations, stereotypes, and personalities and do not know how to communicate authentically. However, the results also demonstrate that conversations amongst family members, family bonding activities, conversation with those outside the family and reminiscing about the past together were the strategies used to overcome the difficulties mentioned above.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".