USING APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY TO UNDERSTAND THE SUPPORT NEEDS OF INDIGENOUS STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The University of Saskatchewan (USask) set enrolment goals for Indigenous students to make up 15% of the undergraduate and 10% of the graduate population by 2025. To continue USask’s decolonization and Indigenization efforts, the organization needs to know how to better support these students if the Indigenous student population is going to grow. \n In this dissertation I explored the unique challenges and barriers that Indigenous students may face at USask that hinder their ability to complete their studies. I described a sample of staff and Indigenous students’ experiences and lessons learned that outline what practices currently contribute to Indigenous student success at USask and what interventions are necessary to overcome continuing barriers to equitable outcomes for Indigenous students. I designed this case study guided by appreciative inquiry to understand the support needs of Indigenous students at USask. Instead of focusing on what is not working, I learned from four Indigenous students who are successfully completing their studies at USask and five staff members in supporting roles.\nIn this study, the literature review themes included racism and resistance, decolonization and Indigenization, defining success, and my own journey acknowledging and understanding my White privilege and what role someone like me can play in Indigenous student success. The theme of defining success was present in both the literature review and participant interviews. This theme showed the need to adopt a holistic view of success for Indigenous students, understanding that success should be measured beyond colonial definitions and in ways that honor Indigenous perspectives and values. The themes from interviews also included the noticeable lack of Indigenous faculty and staff at USask and the need for safe spaces and a sense of community for Indigenous students. Lastly, the participants outlined the barriers and challenges they have faced and how they overcame them, noting that they felt that these were not well known or acknowledged by the institution.\nAs USask aims to increase its Indigenous student population, barriers that prohibit many from successfully completing their studies need to be removed. The support systems available need to be accessible, equitable, and relevant to Indigenous students. While excellent support systems currently exist at USask, colonial policies and regulations continue to create obstacles that undermine the effectiveness of these supports.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».