USING APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY TO UNDERSTAND THE SUPPORT NEEDS OF INDIGENOUS STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The University of Saskatchewan (USask) set enrolment goals for Indigenous students to make up 15% of the undergraduate and 10% of the graduate population by 2025. To continue USask’s decolonization and Indigenization efforts, the organization needs to know how to better support these students if the Indigenous student population is going to grow. \n In this dissertation I explored the unique challenges and barriers that Indigenous students may face at USask that hinder their ability to complete their studies. I described a sample of staff and Indigenous students’ experiences and lessons learned that outline what practices currently contribute to Indigenous student success at USask and what interventions are necessary to overcome continuing barriers to equitable outcomes for Indigenous students. I designed this case study guided by appreciative inquiry to understand the support needs of Indigenous students at USask. Instead of focusing on what is not working, I learned from four Indigenous students who are successfully completing their studies at USask and five staff members in supporting roles.\nIn this study, the literature review themes included racism and resistance, decolonization and Indigenization, defining success, and my own journey acknowledging and understanding my White privilege and what role someone like me can play in Indigenous student success. The theme of defining success was present in both the literature review and participant interviews. This theme showed the need to adopt a holistic view of success for Indigenous students, understanding that success should be measured beyond colonial definitions and in ways that honor Indigenous perspectives and values. The themes from interviews also included the noticeable lack of Indigenous faculty and staff at USask and the need for safe spaces and a sense of community for Indigenous students. Lastly, the participants outlined the barriers and challenges they have faced and how they overcame them, noting that they felt that these were not well known or acknowledged by the institution.\nAs USask aims to increase its Indigenous student population, barriers that prohibit many from successfully completing their studies need to be removed. The support systems available need to be accessible, equitable, and relevant to Indigenous students. While excellent support systems currently exist at USask, colonial policies and regulations continue to create obstacles that undermine the effectiveness of these supports.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".