MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7025208108

USING APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY TO UNDERSTAND THE SUPPORT NEEDS OF INDIGENOUS STUDENTS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN

2024· dissertation· en· W7025208108 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousAppreciative inquiryPopulationIndigenizationRacismPrivilege (computing)Theme (computing)White privilege
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The University of Saskatchewan (USask) set enrolment goals for Indigenous students to make up 15% of the undergraduate and 10% of the graduate population by 2025. To continue USask’s decolonization and Indigenization efforts, the organization needs to know how to better support these students if the Indigenous student population is going to grow. \n In this dissertation I explored the unique challenges and barriers that Indigenous students may face at USask that hinder their ability to complete their studies. I described a sample of staff and Indigenous students’ experiences and lessons learned that outline what practices currently contribute to Indigenous student success at USask and what interventions are necessary to overcome continuing barriers to equitable outcomes for Indigenous students. I designed this case study guided by appreciative inquiry to understand the support needs of Indigenous students at USask. Instead of focusing on what is not working, I learned from four Indigenous students who are successfully completing their studies at USask and five staff members in supporting roles.\nIn this study, the literature review themes included racism and resistance, decolonization and Indigenization, defining success, and my own journey acknowledging and understanding my White privilege and what role someone like me can play in Indigenous student success. The theme of defining success was present in both the literature review and participant interviews. This theme showed the need to adopt a holistic view of success for Indigenous students, understanding that success should be measured beyond colonial definitions and in ways that honor Indigenous perspectives and values. The themes from interviews also included the noticeable lack of Indigenous faculty and staff at USask and the need for safe spaces and a sense of community for Indigenous students. Lastly, the participants outlined the barriers and challenges they have faced and how they overcame them, noting that they felt that these were not well known or acknowledged by the institution.\nAs USask aims to increase its Indigenous student population, barriers that prohibit many from successfully completing their studies need to be removed. The support systems available need to be accessible, equitable, and relevant to Indigenous students. While excellent support systems currently exist at USask, colonial policies and regulations continue to create obstacles that undermine the effectiveness of these supports.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207