Estimating Average Annual Daily Pedestrian Volumes at Intersections based on Turning Movement Counts
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
There is a focus on increasing the use of active transportation and, consequently, a need to have pedestrian traffic volumes such as Annual Average Daily Pedestrian Traffic (AADPT) for infrastructure planning and safety analysis. Traditional methods rely on the deployment of dedicated sensors to count pedestrians, but this limits the number of locations at which counts can be obtained and therefore does not permit estimation of AADPT for all intersections in the urban area. The focus of this thesis is to propose and evaluate methods for addressing this limitation. \nThe proposed methods assume that (i) dedicated sensors that provide continuous pedestrian volume counts are deployed at a small number of intersections within the urban area, and (ii) 8-hour turning movement counts (TMCs) are available for intersections for which AADPT are to be estimated. These two assumptions are normally met in practice. Within this context, the problem of estimating AADPT can be divided into five sub-problems, namely: \n1.\tCalculating AADPT with missing counts in a dataset \n2.\tSelecting and implementing a set of count data filters \n3.\tAssociating specific continuous count sites with each other \n4.\tFinding suitable factors groups for short-term count sites \n5.\tConverting short-term counts to AADPT estimates \nThis thesis examines the existing methods in the literature for solving each of these sub-problems and proposes several extensions. By solving all the subproblems, there is a hope that reliable average daily estimates from pedestrian data collected alongside turning movement counts can be obtained. It is recommended to use the AASHTO method for determining continuous count site AADPT values or solving sub-problem 1. For the data filters, it was determined that using pre-exiting filters from the literature with some adjustments was appropriate. However, a new null count filter was needed for the dataset. For grouping specific continuous count sites, existing solutions from the literature were incorporated into this work along with a proposed k-means clustering approach. Specific land uses and temporal metrics were incorporated into linear regression models for the purposes of predicting specific temporal trends and placing a short-term count site in a factor group. Lastly, the AADPT estimation methods were all taken from the literature and are mathematically adjusted to handle 8hr to 24hr conversions. \nThe methods are applied to a set of field data from Milton, Ontario and Pima County, Arizona. The results indicate that the AADPT estimation error metrics still are much larger for count sites located within 1km of a high school and, consequently, a modified factor grouping method is proposed for sub-problems 3 and 4.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».