MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028378479

Estimating Average Annual Daily Pedestrian Volumes at Intersections based on Turning Movement Counts

2021· dissertation· en· W7028378479 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2021
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianCount dataTraffic countEstimationFocus (optics)Movement (music)Median
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a focus on increasing the use of active transportation and, consequently, a need to have pedestrian traffic volumes such as Annual Average Daily Pedestrian Traffic (AADPT) for infrastructure planning and safety analysis. Traditional methods rely on the deployment of dedicated sensors to count pedestrians, but this limits the number of locations at which counts can be obtained and therefore does not permit estimation of AADPT for all intersections in the urban area. The focus of this thesis is to propose and evaluate methods for addressing this limitation. \nThe proposed methods assume that (i) dedicated sensors that provide continuous pedestrian volume counts are deployed at a small number of intersections within the urban area, and (ii) 8-hour turning movement counts (TMCs) are available for intersections for which AADPT are to be estimated. These two assumptions are normally met in practice. Within this context, the problem of estimating AADPT can be divided into five sub-problems, namely: \n1.\tCalculating AADPT with missing counts in a dataset \n2.\tSelecting and implementing a set of count data filters \n3.\tAssociating specific continuous count sites with each other \n4.\tFinding suitable factors groups for short-term count sites \n5.\tConverting short-term counts to AADPT estimates \nThis thesis examines the existing methods in the literature for solving each of these sub-problems and proposes several extensions. By solving all the subproblems, there is a hope that reliable average daily estimates from pedestrian data collected alongside turning movement counts can be obtained. It is recommended to use the AASHTO method for determining continuous count site AADPT values or solving sub-problem 1. For the data filters, it was determined that using pre-exiting filters from the literature with some adjustments was appropriate. However, a new null count filter was needed for the dataset. For grouping specific continuous count sites, existing solutions from the literature were incorporated into this work along with a proposed k-means clustering approach. Specific land uses and temporal metrics were incorporated into linear regression models for the purposes of predicting specific temporal trends and placing a short-term count site in a factor group. Lastly, the AADPT estimation methods were all taken from the literature and are mathematically adjusted to handle 8hr to 24hr conversions. \nThe methods are applied to a set of field data from Milton, Ontario and Pima County, Arizona. The results indicate that the AADPT estimation error metrics still are much larger for count sites located within 1km of a high school and, consequently, a modified factor grouping method is proposed for sub-problems 3 and 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207