Europafacklig samverkan. Problem och möjligheter
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The overarching aim of this thesis is to examine the conditions for cooperation\namong trade unions in Europe, and to identify factors making it easier or more difficult.\nThe dissertation centers on two crucial areas: wage determination and working-\ntime regulation. The theoretical framework combines theories of industrial relations\nregimes with ideas on meta-organizations, and an approach focusing on the\npower resources of trade unions.\nThe empirical data was collected through a web survey sent by e-mail to all member\norganizations of the ETUC, all the ETUFs and trade unions just below the central\nlevel in 14 European countries. I also carried out interviews, made observations at\ntrade union meetings and collected all kinds of documents. Trade unions in different\ncountries and institutional settings were strategically selected for the interviews\nand the survey.\nIn study I, I examine the revision of the EU Working Time Directive and how European\ntrade unions and employer organizations have responded to this revision.\nStudy II explores trade union attitudes towards issues of future wage setting on national\nand European level, and in particular, their attitudes towards statutory minimum\nwages. In study III I address the conditions for transnational trade union cooperation\nin the wake of the Laval case, and examine whether the case is perceived\nto have affected European trade union relations. Study IV, finally, focuses on trade\nunion attitudes towards a European regulation of working time and whether these\nattitudes are related to what industrial regime the trade unions belong to. The article\nalso compares the trade union approach to a European working time regulation\nwith the approach to a European regulation of minimum wage.\nThe analyses showed that comparative regime theory has quite large explanatory\npower as to various union attitudes towards certain regulations, strategies and cooperation\nin Europe. Whereas today there is increasing support among trade unions\nin Europe towards statutory minimum wages on European level, there is rejection\nof this solution among the Nordic unions who insist on keeping their system\nwith negotiated wage-setting. The results can be understood with reference to differences\nin the domestic labour market and to the strength of the trade unions or,\nin other words, their membership and bargaining power. Trade unions in countries\nwith high union density and strong collective bargaining power are inclined to preserve\ntheir current wage systems, whereas trade unions in countries with weak bargaining\npower are more likely to seek new ways to defend wages. However, as I\nargue based on the analyses, trade union attitudes towards transnational cooperation\nmay also be issue-specific, which the case of a European working-time regulation\nillustrates. Although institutional differences between countries are important\nobstacles they cannot alone explain union cooperation or the lack of union cooperation\nin Europe.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».