The experience of angina pectoris characteristics and coping with coronary heart disease illustrated by Iranian patients from a gender-related perspective
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is a major cause of death for both men and women around the world. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify effective ways and plans to prevent CHD and to ensure patients with Angina Pectoris (AP) seek medical care. A critical issue for developing these plans is to consider the symptom experiences of patients with CHD. Patients with CHD have to live and deal with this life-long disease. Nurses as health-care providers need to be aware of this process for helping patients to cope with the illness and its symptoms. Moreover, gender as a socio-cultural concept might influence how patients experience AP characteristics and cope with CHD. Thus, it needs to be investigated particularly in Iran where there is a lack of information about this issue. \n \n \n \nThis doctoral thesis aims at exploring and describing experiences of AP characteristics and coping with CHD from a gender-related perspective. The doctoral thesis includes four sub-studies. The first two sub-studies regarded instrumentation. The AP characteristics questionnaire, which includes the Modified Rose Questionnaire (MRQ), the Short Form-McGill pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and the accompanying symptom checklist, was utilized. \n \n \n \nThe aims of sub-study I were to describe the process of translating the SF-MPQ, MRQ and accompanying symptom checklist from English to Persian and to evaluate substantial psychometric works (content and construct validity) for the entire instrument and each part of it (SF-MPQ, MRQ and accompanying symptom checklist). The aim of sub-study II was to evaluate internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the Iranian version of the AP characteristics questionnaire. The instrument was translated through a combined approach. Then, one hundred and ten patients with CHD (diagnosis on the basis of angiography) who experienced AP were selected for evaluating the reliability and validity of the instrument. According to the results, the Iranian version of AP characteristics questionnaire was a valid, consistent and reliable tool for evaluating AP in Iranian patients with CHD. \n \n \n \nThe aim of sub-study III was to examine gender differences in the description, intensity and location of AP in patients with CHD to determine gender-specific variations in the characteristics of AP symptoms. In this cross-sectional study, five hundred patients with AP were chosen and filled out the Iranian version of AP characteristics questionnaire. The results indicated that, in comparison with men, women felt a greater intensity of pain, chose more pain descriptors, and were more likely to report pain in the neck and left arm, hand, and scapula. \n \n \n \nSub-study IV which was a grounded theory study aimed at exploring and describing the experiences of and coping with CHD and how gender influences on experiences reported by the participants. Twenty four patients were chosen through purposive sampling. The sampling was continued with theoretical sampling. The findings indicated that patients with CHD who experienced AP tried to cope with the illness and its consequences. The findings are presented as the process of “transitioning to normalize life” with the following categories: 1) losing normal life: experiencing emotions and consequences of illness, 2) coming to terms and using coping strategies and 3) recreating normal life. Men and women showed differences in some of the issues such as interpersonal relationships, responding to illness, searching for information and receiving the family support. In conclusion, men and women with CHD experience a variety of symptoms which can be related to various psycho-physiological, clinical, and anatomical factors, anxiety sensitivity, depression and communication abilities. \n \n \n \nDuring the coping process, the participants transitioned to living normally again. However, there were gender-related differences in some aspects of coping such as using coping strategies and receiving support. The findings can be useful for considering gender perspectives in health-care services, training health professionals, and also educating society to become aware of gender differences in experiencing AP characteristics and coping with CHD.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».