The experience of angina pectoris characteristics and coping with coronary heart disease illustrated by Iranian patients from a gender-related perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) is a major cause of death for both men and women around the world. Therefore, it is of great importance to identify effective ways and plans to prevent CHD and to ensure patients with Angina Pectoris (AP) seek medical care. A critical issue for developing these plans is to consider the symptom experiences of patients with CHD. Patients with CHD have to live and deal with this life-long disease. Nurses as health-care providers need to be aware of this process for helping patients to cope with the illness and its symptoms. Moreover, gender as a socio-cultural concept might influence how patients experience AP characteristics and cope with CHD. Thus, it needs to be investigated particularly in Iran where there is a lack of information about this issue. \n \n \n \nThis doctoral thesis aims at exploring and describing experiences of AP characteristics and coping with CHD from a gender-related perspective. The doctoral thesis includes four sub-studies. The first two sub-studies regarded instrumentation. The AP characteristics questionnaire, which includes the Modified Rose Questionnaire (MRQ), the Short Form-McGill pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and the accompanying symptom checklist, was utilized. \n \n \n \nThe aims of sub-study I were to describe the process of translating the SF-MPQ, MRQ and accompanying symptom checklist from English to Persian and to evaluate substantial psychometric works (content and construct validity) for the entire instrument and each part of it (SF-MPQ, MRQ and accompanying symptom checklist). The aim of sub-study II was to evaluate internal consistency and test–retest reliability of the Iranian version of the AP characteristics questionnaire. The instrument was translated through a combined approach. Then, one hundred and ten patients with CHD (diagnosis on the basis of angiography) who experienced AP were selected for evaluating the reliability and validity of the instrument. According to the results, the Iranian version of AP characteristics questionnaire was a valid, consistent and reliable tool for evaluating AP in Iranian patients with CHD. \n \n \n \nThe aim of sub-study III was to examine gender differences in the description, intensity and location of AP in patients with CHD to determine gender-specific variations in the characteristics of AP symptoms. In this cross-sectional study, five hundred patients with AP were chosen and filled out the Iranian version of AP characteristics questionnaire. The results indicated that, in comparison with men, women felt a greater intensity of pain, chose more pain descriptors, and were more likely to report pain in the neck and left arm, hand, and scapula. \n \n \n \nSub-study IV which was a grounded theory study aimed at exploring and describing the experiences of and coping with CHD and how gender influences on experiences reported by the participants. Twenty four patients were chosen through purposive sampling. The sampling was continued with theoretical sampling. The findings indicated that patients with CHD who experienced AP tried to cope with the illness and its consequences. The findings are presented as the process of “transitioning to normalize life” with the following categories: 1) losing normal life: experiencing emotions and consequences of illness, 2) coming to terms and using coping strategies and 3) recreating normal life. Men and women showed differences in some of the issues such as interpersonal relationships, responding to illness, searching for information and receiving the family support. In conclusion, men and women with CHD experience a variety of symptoms which can be related to various psycho-physiological, clinical, and anatomical factors, anxiety sensitivity, depression and communication abilities. \n \n \n \nDuring the coping process, the participants transitioned to living normally again. However, there were gender-related differences in some aspects of coping such as using coping strategies and receiving support. The findings can be useful for considering gender perspectives in health-care services, training health professionals, and also educating society to become aware of gender differences in experiencing AP characteristics and coping with CHD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".