MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7028984503

Improved clustering techniques in wireless sensor networks

2012· dissertation· en· W7028984503 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueComics and Graphic Narratives
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCluster analysisWireless sensor networkEnergy consumptionLatency (audio)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksEfficient energy useFault detection and isolation
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With developments in technology, ad hoc Wireless Sensor Networks are gaining prominence in monitoring and surveillance applications, especially in remote regions and in terrains which are dangerous for human intervention.An example of such an application is in controlling and monitoring equipments (such as transformers and circuit breakers) in a high voltage substation.Since the sensor networks are often employed in regions which are inaccessible, it is crucial that these networks function for long periods of time.A lot of research is focused on developing techniques to reduce energy consumption, and thereby increase the network's lifetime.An example of a technique that enables efficient energy consumption in sensor networks is clustering.The main contribution of this thesis is to propose modifications to the existing clustering algorithms (viz., LEACH and EECH) in order to reduce energy consumption, and thereby enhance the network lifetime.Simulations were performed to compare the performance of the modified algorithms (viz., LEACH-Improved and EECH-Improved) with the original algorithms.The results of these simulations show that the modifications proposed enhance the performance of the clustering algorithms.The performance metrics used for comparison are the energy consumption in the network, the amount of data successfully transmitted from the network to the end user, the lifetime of the network, and the latency in the network.In monitoring applications, latency in the network is often a crucial parameter as it is essential that the monitored parameters are transmitted to the end user with minimum delay.Further, latency is often the determining parameter in fault detection applications.An important contribution of this thesis is in providing an analysis of the latency when different algorithms are used.The factors that have an impact on the latency experienced by nodes in the network have been analyzed.Further, as part of this thesis, we have analyzed the dependency of the delay experienced by a node on its geographical location in different types of networks.The simulations show that the delay experienced by a node is dependent on the clustering algorithm, as well as its geographical position in the network.The analysis presented in this thesis can aid researchers in choosing efficient clustering algorithms for different networks.First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisor and mentor, Prof. Fabrice Labeau for his guidance and support, as well as his belief and confidence in me.Without him, this thesis work would not have been possible.He changed my perspective on how certain problems are solved.Prof. Labeau's attitude towards his students and the lab has made working with him a remarkably pleasant and enjoyable experience.I would also like to thank the teaching and non-teaching staff at McGill University for the numerous ways in which they were a source of help and support.Thanks are also due to my lab-mates for being such good friends.I have had a great time with them on as well as off the campus.Heartfelt gratitude and thanks to my parents, sister and family for being supportive and egging me on to perform my very best.I thank my grandparents who believe I can never fail.I'll always be grateful to my family.Thanks are due to all my friends at Montreal, in particular

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,839
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,231
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Même sujetComics and Graphic NarrativesTravaux en français237 207