MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7028984503

Improved clustering techniques in wireless sensor networks

2012· dissertation· en· W7028984503 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicComics and Graphic Narratives
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisWireless sensor networkEnergy consumptionLatency (audio)Key distribution in wireless sensor networksEfficient energy useFault detection and isolation
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With developments in technology, ad hoc Wireless Sensor Networks are gaining prominence in monitoring and surveillance applications, especially in remote regions and in terrains which are dangerous for human intervention.An example of such an application is in controlling and monitoring equipments (such as transformers and circuit breakers) in a high voltage substation.Since the sensor networks are often employed in regions which are inaccessible, it is crucial that these networks function for long periods of time.A lot of research is focused on developing techniques to reduce energy consumption, and thereby increase the network's lifetime.An example of a technique that enables efficient energy consumption in sensor networks is clustering.The main contribution of this thesis is to propose modifications to the existing clustering algorithms (viz., LEACH and EECH) in order to reduce energy consumption, and thereby enhance the network lifetime.Simulations were performed to compare the performance of the modified algorithms (viz., LEACH-Improved and EECH-Improved) with the original algorithms.The results of these simulations show that the modifications proposed enhance the performance of the clustering algorithms.The performance metrics used for comparison are the energy consumption in the network, the amount of data successfully transmitted from the network to the end user, the lifetime of the network, and the latency in the network.In monitoring applications, latency in the network is often a crucial parameter as it is essential that the monitored parameters are transmitted to the end user with minimum delay.Further, latency is often the determining parameter in fault detection applications.An important contribution of this thesis is in providing an analysis of the latency when different algorithms are used.The factors that have an impact on the latency experienced by nodes in the network have been analyzed.Further, as part of this thesis, we have analyzed the dependency of the delay experienced by a node on its geographical location in different types of networks.The simulations show that the delay experienced by a node is dependent on the clustering algorithm, as well as its geographical position in the network.The analysis presented in this thesis can aid researchers in choosing efficient clustering algorithms for different networks.First and foremost, I wish to thank my supervisor and mentor, Prof. Fabrice Labeau for his guidance and support, as well as his belief and confidence in me.Without him, this thesis work would not have been possible.He changed my perspective on how certain problems are solved.Prof. Labeau's attitude towards his students and the lab has made working with him a remarkably pleasant and enjoyable experience.I would also like to thank the teaching and non-teaching staff at McGill University for the numerous ways in which they were a source of help and support.Thanks are also due to my lab-mates for being such good friends.I have had a great time with them on as well as off the campus.Heartfelt gratitude and thanks to my parents, sister and family for being supportive and egging me on to perform my very best.I thank my grandparents who believe I can never fail.I'll always be grateful to my family.Thanks are due to all my friends at Montreal, in particular

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicComics and Graphic NarrativesFrench-language works237,207