MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7029236610

The investigation of the effect on the energy parameters using R442A instead of R22 in air-conditioning systems

2016· article· en· W7029236610 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMathematics
ThématiqueMathematics and Applications
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefrigerantRefrigerationMontreal ProtocolGlobal-warming potentialFreonEnergy consumptionGlobal warmingPower consumptionOzone layerCooling capacity
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The refrigerant of R22 is widely used in the airconditioning systems. However this refrigerant would be gradually removed to use as per Montreal protocol since it has a serious potential of ozone depletion. According to EU regulations, refrigerants, which do not deplete the ozone layer, having low global warming potential (GWP) should be preferred in both air-conditioning and refrigeration systems. Obviously, the gas leakages may occur from the available devices operating with R22 as a result of their maintenance and installation elsewhere. Hence, R22 currently utilized in the refrigeration systems should be replaced with refrigerants having ozone depletion potential (ODP) of zero in order to protect the ozone layer. Although the air-conditioners of small capacity are widely used, the effect of different alternative refrigerants (especially R442A) on the energy parameters such as COP, cooling capacity, and power consumption etc. is not well known. Some studies can be found in the literature on refrigerants, which are not ozone-depleting, as alternatives for R22 in the air-conditioning systems. The refrigerants such as R407C and R410A that do not deplete the ozone layer are used as an alternative for R22 in the air-conditioners by implementing some modifications in the system. It was remarked in the previous studies that the refrigerants should be preferred as alternatives to HCFC-22. The related investigations are still continuing due to the significance of the topic. The literature survey has pointed out that there are two possible methods to use the alternative refrigerants in air-conditioning or refrigeration systems. In the first one, the new refrigerant is directly charged into the system instead of R22 without making any constructional modification which is called as “drop-in” process. On the other hand, the second method known as “retrofitting” in which changing compressor oil and/or modifying some elements of the system depending on the refrigerant type would be necessary. In this study, an experimental investigation was carried out using R442A as a substitute for R22 in a vapour compression air-conditioning system. A split-type air-conditioning device with a cooling capacity of 2.05 kW and operating with R22 was used as the experimental test unit. Although GWP values of R22 and R442A are similar, their ODP values are 0.05 and zero, respectively. Both refrigerants have been classified as non-flammable class by ASHRAE. Moreover, the thermodynamic properties of the tested refrigerants were seen to be in the similar range of magnitude. The compressor oil has only been changed in the experimental system such that while mineral oil was used for R22, synthetic Polyolester oil (POE) was utilized for the case of R442A. The experiments were conducted under the same conditions for each refrigerant at three different ambient temperatures, Ta (25°C, 30°C, 35°C). Basically, measurements of mass flow rate, pressure and temperatures in the system were accomplished for the experimental work. The enthalpy values of the refrigerants have been subsequently determined according to the measured data through Refprop software. The compression ratio, cooling capacity, power consumption of the compressor, and coefficient of performance (COP) were evaluated in the investigation. Then the comparison of these determined energy parameters for both refrigerants were performed. It was seen that mass flow rate of R442A was smaller than that of R22 at the considered ambient temperatures. The evaporation temperature, Te had greater values for higher Ta cases regardless of refrigerant type while Te for R22 was lower compared to R442A. The compression ratio, PH/PL increased with Ta and it was larger for R442A case. The experimental results demonstrated that the cooling capacity and COP values of R22 were somewhat greater in comparison with R442A. Furthermore, the power consumption of the compressor was lower in the case of using R22. In addition, the COP was considerably reduced as a result of increasing Ta for both refrigerants. According to the experimental results of the present investigation R442A should be a suitable refrigerant in the medium term that can be alternatively utilized in the air-conditioning systems considering its zero ozone depletion potential and similar energy parameters of R22.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,576
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,207

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,032
Tête enseignante GPT0,227
Écart entre enseignants0,195 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Même sujetMathematics and ApplicationsTravaux en français237 207