MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7029236610

The investigation of the effect on the energy parameters using R442A instead of R22 in air-conditioning systems

2016· article· en· W7029236610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantRefrigerationMontreal ProtocolGlobal-warming potentialFreonEnergy consumptionGlobal warmingPower consumptionOzone layerCooling capacity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The refrigerant of R22 is widely used in the airconditioning systems. However this refrigerant would be gradually removed to use as per Montreal protocol since it has a serious potential of ozone depletion. According to EU regulations, refrigerants, which do not deplete the ozone layer, having low global warming potential (GWP) should be preferred in both air-conditioning and refrigeration systems. Obviously, the gas leakages may occur from the available devices operating with R22 as a result of their maintenance and installation elsewhere. Hence, R22 currently utilized in the refrigeration systems should be replaced with refrigerants having ozone depletion potential (ODP) of zero in order to protect the ozone layer. Although the air-conditioners of small capacity are widely used, the effect of different alternative refrigerants (especially R442A) on the energy parameters such as COP, cooling capacity, and power consumption etc. is not well known. Some studies can be found in the literature on refrigerants, which are not ozone-depleting, as alternatives for R22 in the air-conditioning systems. The refrigerants such as R407C and R410A that do not deplete the ozone layer are used as an alternative for R22 in the air-conditioners by implementing some modifications in the system. It was remarked in the previous studies that the refrigerants should be preferred as alternatives to HCFC-22. The related investigations are still continuing due to the significance of the topic. The literature survey has pointed out that there are two possible methods to use the alternative refrigerants in air-conditioning or refrigeration systems. In the first one, the new refrigerant is directly charged into the system instead of R22 without making any constructional modification which is called as “drop-in” process. On the other hand, the second method known as “retrofitting” in which changing compressor oil and/or modifying some elements of the system depending on the refrigerant type would be necessary. In this study, an experimental investigation was carried out using R442A as a substitute for R22 in a vapour compression air-conditioning system. A split-type air-conditioning device with a cooling capacity of 2.05 kW and operating with R22 was used as the experimental test unit. Although GWP values of R22 and R442A are similar, their ODP values are 0.05 and zero, respectively. Both refrigerants have been classified as non-flammable class by ASHRAE. Moreover, the thermodynamic properties of the tested refrigerants were seen to be in the similar range of magnitude. The compressor oil has only been changed in the experimental system such that while mineral oil was used for R22, synthetic Polyolester oil (POE) was utilized for the case of R442A. The experiments were conducted under the same conditions for each refrigerant at three different ambient temperatures, Ta (25°C, 30°C, 35°C). Basically, measurements of mass flow rate, pressure and temperatures in the system were accomplished for the experimental work. The enthalpy values of the refrigerants have been subsequently determined according to the measured data through Refprop software. The compression ratio, cooling capacity, power consumption of the compressor, and coefficient of performance (COP) were evaluated in the investigation. Then the comparison of these determined energy parameters for both refrigerants were performed. It was seen that mass flow rate of R442A was smaller than that of R22 at the considered ambient temperatures. The evaporation temperature, Te had greater values for higher Ta cases regardless of refrigerant type while Te for R22 was lower compared to R442A. The compression ratio, PH/PL increased with Ta and it was larger for R442A case. The experimental results demonstrated that the cooling capacity and COP values of R22 were somewhat greater in comparison with R442A. Furthermore, the power consumption of the compressor was lower in the case of using R22. In addition, the COP was considerably reduced as a result of increasing Ta for both refrigerants. According to the experimental results of the present investigation R442A should be a suitable refrigerant in the medium term that can be alternatively utilized in the air-conditioning systems considering its zero ozone depletion potential and similar energy parameters of R22.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score0.207

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicMathematics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207