MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7033300594

A Pluralistic Approach to Oppression and Latino Terra Nullius

2008· article· en· W7033300594 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineComputer Science
ThématiqueMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIndigenousMiamiOppressionFourth WorldRacismLatin AmericansPraxisTRIPS architecturePrivilege (computing)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper contains the substance of a talk that I gave at LatCrit XII in Miami, Florida on Panel C4: Coalition Building, Globally and Locally. It is an outgrowth of my observation of the relative lack of participation by indigenous peoples from the Americas, particularly from the South, within LatCrit itself. It draws on my lived experiences at LatCrit's South-North Exchange on Theory, Culture, and Law in San Juan, Puerto Rico in May of 2005 (SNX 2005) as well as the comments of my hotel roommate, June McCue at the University of British Columbia law school in Canada. The topic of that South-North Exchange was "The Americas and their Indigenous People: Assessing the International Decade of the World's Indigenous people (from 1994-2004)." Professor McCue aptly summed up the SNX 2005 conference well in one phrase - "latino terra nullius." My purpose at LatCrit XII in Miami was to draw on these experiences as well as the theory of Chela Sandoval' to achieve praxis with respect to the participation of indigenous peoples within LatCrit. Because my reflections are intimately connected to my personal background, I begin with a brief synopsis of who I am. I am a forty-eight year old law professor of Eastern Cherokee and African American ancestry' who has long engaged in work on issues involving indigenous peoples. I have also done some work on red/black relationships. I am a former Tribal Attorney for the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes in Fort Hall, Idaho. I have also made several trips to Geneva to observe the workings of the United Nations' Working Group on Indigenous Populations and two trips to New York City as an observer of the Permanent Forum on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Although my family is originally from the Tennessee area, as someone born and raised in Chicago, Illinois, my views are also colored by the urban experience. LatCrit has long used a variety of theoretical methodologies - including doctrinal deconstruction, policy-based political analysis of current affairs, personal narratives, and social psychology -to effectuate its goals. There has also been ongoing discussion about the relationship between LatCrit and others in the critical jurisprudential movement dating from at least LatCrit Ill. Most of these relationship questions revolve around Critical Race Theory, most notably as it and LatCrit itself relate to the Black experience. The participation of indigenous peoples within LatCrit has been sporadic and miniscule at best. Those individuals who identify as being of indigenous origin" who have participated in LatCrit have been primarily, if not exclusively, from the North in spite of the fact that the largest indigenous populations of the Americas are in the South. This is so in spite of the fact that there are also numerous indigenous intellectuals from the South.'2 Even LatCrit XII reflected the difficulty that elites from the South have in placing their 'locus of enunciation' beyond mestizo-criollo consciousness." My paper attempts to address this dichotomy by incorporating personal narrative with some of the alternative modes of criticism that Sandoval has developed with the express purpose of fostering "the end of academic apartheid." To that end, she has devised methods through which one can "listen to and participate in conversations heretofore largely inaudible across the borders of subjectivity." It is Sandoval's fourth tactic, that of "cyber-love" or the "hermeneutic of love," which is the primary thrust of this paper. Getting to praxis requires applying that cyberlove to the indigenous peoples who are so noticeably absent from LatCrit. To put things in better context, however, I must begin with a personal narrative. Innocent Brown Faces Innocent brown faces smile you can. The white world awaits you. The time is at hand. At five you enter those structures, their design, while dads and moms stay muted behind. We weep for you. We hope for you. Indeed we pray for you. But on the day you enter, on that first fateful day, seals your destiny. Our substance flows away.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,069

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0190,059
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0010,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,244
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Même sujetMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing→Travaux en français237 207→