MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7033300594

A Pluralistic Approach to Oppression and Latino Terra Nullius

2008· article· en· W7033300594 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeYLS (Yale Law School) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousMiamiOppressionFourth WorldRacismLatin AmericansPraxisTRIPS architecturePrivilege (computing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper contains the substance of a talk that I gave at LatCrit XII in Miami, Florida on Panel C4: Coalition Building, Globally and Locally. It is an outgrowth of my observation of the relative lack of participation by indigenous peoples from the Americas, particularly from the South, within LatCrit itself. It draws on my lived experiences at LatCrit's South-North Exchange on Theory, Culture, and Law in San Juan, Puerto Rico in May of 2005 (SNX 2005) as well as the comments of my hotel roommate, June McCue at the University of British Columbia law school in Canada. The topic of that South-North Exchange was "The Americas and their Indigenous People: Assessing the International Decade of the World's Indigenous people (from 1994-2004)." Professor McCue aptly summed up the SNX 2005 conference well in one phrase - "latino terra nullius." My purpose at LatCrit XII in Miami was to draw on these experiences as well as the theory of Chela Sandoval' to achieve praxis with respect to the participation of indigenous peoples within LatCrit. Because my reflections are intimately connected to my personal background, I begin with a brief synopsis of who I am. I am a forty-eight year old law professor of Eastern Cherokee and African American ancestry' who has long engaged in work on issues involving indigenous peoples. I have also done some work on red/black relationships. I am a former Tribal Attorney for the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes in Fort Hall, Idaho. I have also made several trips to Geneva to observe the workings of the United Nations' Working Group on Indigenous Populations and two trips to New York City as an observer of the Permanent Forum on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Although my family is originally from the Tennessee area, as someone born and raised in Chicago, Illinois, my views are also colored by the urban experience. LatCrit has long used a variety of theoretical methodologies - including doctrinal deconstruction, policy-based political analysis of current affairs, personal narratives, and social psychology -to effectuate its goals. There has also been ongoing discussion about the relationship between LatCrit and others in the critical jurisprudential movement dating from at least LatCrit Ill. Most of these relationship questions revolve around Critical Race Theory, most notably as it and LatCrit itself relate to the Black experience. The participation of indigenous peoples within LatCrit has been sporadic and miniscule at best. Those individuals who identify as being of indigenous origin" who have participated in LatCrit have been primarily, if not exclusively, from the North in spite of the fact that the largest indigenous populations of the Americas are in the South. This is so in spite of the fact that there are also numerous indigenous intellectuals from the South.'2 Even LatCrit XII reflected the difficulty that elites from the South have in placing their 'locus of enunciation' beyond mestizo-criollo consciousness." My paper attempts to address this dichotomy by incorporating personal narrative with some of the alternative modes of criticism that Sandoval has developed with the express purpose of fostering "the end of academic apartheid." To that end, she has devised methods through which one can "listen to and participate in conversations heretofore largely inaudible across the borders of subjectivity." It is Sandoval's fourth tactic, that of "cyber-love" or the "hermeneutic of love," which is the primary thrust of this paper. Getting to praxis requires applying that cyberlove to the indigenous peoples who are so noticeably absent from LatCrit. To put things in better context, however, I must begin with a personal narrative. Innocent Brown Faces Innocent brown faces smile you can. The white world awaits you. The time is at hand. At five you enter those structures, their design, while dads and moms stay muted behind. We weep for you. We hope for you. Indeed we pray for you. But on the day you enter, on that first fateful day, seals your destiny. Our substance flows away.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.059
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeYLS (Yale Law School)→Same topicMathematics, Computing, and Information Processing→French-language works237,207→