Social cognitive impairments:are there differences between various neurological patient groups?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background<br/>It is known that impairments in social cognitive functioning occur in various neurological disorders such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), brain tumour, Parkinsons Disease, and other. Impairments in social cognition can be diverse including difficulties with perceiving social information (emotion recognition), understanding social information (taking perspective, Theory of Mind), and regulating behaviour. Which of these aspects is most apparent varies between patients. So far, it is not clear whether neurological patient groups show differences in social cognitive impairments. Therefore, the aim of this explorative study is to investigate if there is variance in how social cognitive impairments manifest across various neurological disorders. <br/><br/>Methods<br/>69 patients with various neurological disorders (14 TBI, 19 stroke, 15 brain tumour, 12 MS and 9 other) with social cognitive or behavioural impairments were included and compared to 55 healthy controls, matched on age, gender and educational level. All participants performed the Eckman-60faces-test (EFT) to measure emotion recognition, Happé cartoon test and Faux-pas test measuring Theory of Mind, and Dysexecutive Questionnaire self-administered and proxy-administered (DEX-self and DEX-proxy) to measure behaviour. Only patients filled in the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20).<br/>Differences between patients and healthy controls were tested by means of independent sample t-tests. To measure the differences between the patient groups, a one-way ANOVA was used. <br/><br/>Results<br/>All patients scored significantly lower on the EFT-Total score (p < .05), Happé cartoon test (p < .001), DEX-self (p < .001), and Dex-proxy (p < .001) compared to healthy controls. Patients did not significantly differ from healthy controls on the Faux-pas test. Furthermore, results showed no significant differences between the various patient groups on any of the tests or questionnaires. <br/><br/>Discussion<br/>This study shows that impairments in social cognition indeed occur in various neurological patient groups. Between the different patient groups, no differences were found with regard to any of the aspects of their social cognitive impairments (emotion recognition, Theory of Mind and behaviour). This suggests that the variance in social cognitive impairment differs more between single patients than between specific patient groups, which stresses the importance to consider and measure social cognitive impairments in various neurological patient groups. Moreover, these results suggest that available evidence-based treatments (such as T-ScEmo) could apply for all neurological patients with social cognitive impairments. <br/>
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».