MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7033874200

Social cognitive impairments:are there differences between various neurological patient groups?

2024· article· en· W7033874200 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhysics and Engineering Research Articles
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionAlexithymiaMultiple sclerosisSocial cognitionSocial cognitive theoryAnalysis of varianceTheory of mindPsychometricsToronto Alexithymia ScaleTest (biology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background<br/>It is known that impairments in social cognitive functioning occur in various neurological disorders such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, multiple sclerosis (MS), brain tumour, Parkinsons Disease, and other. Impairments in social cognition can be diverse including difficulties with perceiving social information (emotion recognition), understanding social information (taking perspective, Theory of Mind), and regulating behaviour. Which of these aspects is most apparent varies between patients. So far, it is not clear whether neurological patient groups show differences in social cognitive impairments. Therefore, the aim of this explorative study is to investigate if there is variance in how social cognitive impairments manifest across various neurological disorders. <br/><br/>Methods<br/>69 patients with various neurological disorders (14 TBI, 19 stroke, 15 brain tumour, 12 MS and 9 other) with social cognitive or behavioural impairments were included and compared to 55 healthy controls, matched on age, gender and educational level. All participants performed the Eckman-60faces-test (EFT) to measure emotion recognition, Happé cartoon test and Faux-pas test measuring Theory of Mind, and Dysexecutive Questionnaire self-administered and proxy-administered (DEX-self and DEX-proxy) to measure behaviour. Only patients filled in the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20).<br/>Differences between patients and healthy controls were tested by means of independent sample t-tests. To measure the differences between the patient groups, a one-way ANOVA was used. <br/><br/>Results<br/>All patients scored significantly lower on the EFT-Total score (p &lt; .05), Happé cartoon test (p &lt; .001), DEX-self (p &lt; .001), and Dex-proxy (p &lt; .001) compared to healthy controls. Patients did not significantly differ from healthy controls on the Faux-pas test. Furthermore, results showed no significant differences between the various patient groups on any of the tests or questionnaires. <br/><br/>Discussion<br/>This study shows that impairments in social cognition indeed occur in various neurological patient groups. Between the different patient groups, no differences were found with regard to any of the aspects of their social cognitive impairments (emotion recognition, Theory of Mind and behaviour). This suggests that the variance in social cognitive impairment differs more between single patients than between specific patient groups, which stresses the importance to consider and measure social cognitive impairments in various neurological patient groups. Moreover, these results suggest that available evidence-based treatments (such as T-ScEmo) could apply for all neurological patients with social cognitive impairments. <br/>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.774
Threshold uncertainty score0.800

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)Same topicPhysics and Engineering Research ArticlesFrench-language works237,207