Transmission and Transport of Energy in the Western U.S. and Canada: A Law and Policy Road Map
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This collection of essays arose from presentations made by participants at the inaugural meeting of the Idaho Symposium on Energy in the West held at the Sun Valley Lodge in Ketchum, Idaho, on November 13 th and 14 th , 2014.The topic chosen for this first Symposium was Transmission and Transport of Energy in the Western U.S. and Canada: A Law and Policy Road Map.The topic was purposefully large in scope, engaging as many energy sectors and as much of the western U.S. and Canada as possible.The proceedings of this meeting, in turn, will inform future meetings of the Symposium series that will focus on more defined, particularized aspects of western energy production and use.The Symposium began with two panels that explored energy infrastructural choices that the western U.S. and Canada currently face.Sam Kalen, University of Wyoming College of Law, spoke on law's role in embedding choices in the energy landscape, as well as the nature of a resilient legal architecture necessary to facilitate today's lowcarbon preferences.Tara Righetti, also of the University of Wyoming College of Law, then discussed flaring rules related to natural gas exploration in the west.She also discussed how those changes may influence the expansion of natural gas transportation and storage infrastructures in the west.K.K. Duvivier, Sturm College of Law, University of Denver, discussed several problems related to the distribution of wind resources and proposed several solutions.Troy Rule, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, offered thoughts on utilities and the market for rooftop solar generation.Don Howell, chief legal counsel for the Idaho Public Utilities Commission, discussed one state's complications in integrating renewables into its energy portfolio.The Symposium then turned to a discussion of the potential impacts of the Clean Air Act section 111(d) Clean Power Plan, which was led by Melissa Powers, Lewis and Clark Law School.Issues raised in Prof. Powers' session were continued in the Symposium's afternoon sessions, which were dedicated to western regional energy planning.Three attorneys from the Green Energy Institute at the Lewis and Clark Law School presented on a variety of energy planning issues.Nick Lawton discussed promoting renewable energy development on public lands; Amelia Schlusser discussed the Clean Power Plan's implications for the western grid; and Nate Larsen discussed how utility reforms in Hawaii and New York could ultimately have implications on the Northwest's electricity industry.The theme of western regional energy planning was continued into the Symposium's last panel.John Fazio, a senior power systems analyst for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council, discussed the Council's current progress on the Seventh Northwest Conservation and Electric Power Plan.David Solan, Boise State University, discussed the creation of energy imbalance markets across the western United States.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,006 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».