Women Journalists and the Municipal Housekeeping Movement: 1868-1914
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Women Journalists and the Municipal Housekeeping Movement: 1868-1914. Agnes Hooper Gottlieb. Lewiston, NY and Queenston, Ontario: Edwin Mellen Press, Ltd., 2001. 208 pp. $89.95 hbk. American women of the nineteenth century had a hard time convincing the world that they were more than creatures of the home whose primary purpose was to serve their men folk and raise their children. Prevailing notions defined them as angels of the hearth and denizens of the domestic sphere, and any attempts to enter the world of politics, commerce, and industry were quickly met with disdain, disbelief, and hostility. Women learned that when they called for change, it was best to couch their demands in words that would be acceptable to a conservative nation. By defining themselves in the traditional role of housekeeper, they could deflect criticisms that they were acting out of their proper sphere. They could use the vocabulary of mothers and housewives to convince others that they were ideally equipped with the required temperament and experience to clean up the nation, starting with their own neighborhood, then expanding into the city and beyond. Thus the term came into existence. It was a clever way for women to claim a public voice while maintaining the outward appearance of continuing in their traditional role. Ironically, however, by reiterating woman's role as housekeeper, the term also trivialized women's efforts and prevented them from breaking out of the stereotypical definition of housekeeper, which haunts them even today at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Agnes Cooper Gottlieb, an associate professor of communication and women's studies at Seton Hall University, uses the municipal housekeeping movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as the backdrop for her discussion of a number of women journalists who worked in a variety of roles for newspapers and magazines during the era. After describing the movement as well as the general development of women in journalism through the nineteenth century, she highlights the lives and careers of more than a dozen women who came to adopt much of the movement's rhetoric in their writing. In chapters devoted individually to women who wrote for and about the women's club movement, those who wrote for newspapers, and those who wrote for magazines, Gottlieb describes each one's role as a promoter of reform. She analyzes the journalist's work, highlighting the ways in which she expressed the values and used the strategies of the municipal housekeeping movement to promote her cause. Some of the writers discussed in detail are Jane Cunningham Croly (Jennie June), Helen Winslow, Rheta Childe Dorr, Florence Kelley, and Helen Campbell. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».