MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W70393515

Women Journalists and the Municipal Housekeeping Movement: 1868-1914

2002· article· en· W70393515 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth Burt

Bibliographic record

VenueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsCreaturesPublic sphereSociologyHousekeepingWifeLawMedia studiesGender studiesHistoryPolitical scienceNatural (archaeology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Women Journalists and the Municipal Housekeeping Movement: 1868-1914. Agnes Hooper Gottlieb. Lewiston, NY and Queenston, Ontario: Edwin Mellen Press, Ltd., 2001. 208 pp. $89.95 hbk. American women of the nineteenth century had a hard time convincing the world that they were more than creatures of the home whose primary purpose was to serve their men folk and raise their children. Prevailing notions defined them as angels of the hearth and denizens of the domestic sphere, and any attempts to enter the world of politics, commerce, and industry were quickly met with disdain, disbelief, and hostility. Women learned that when they called for change, it was best to couch their demands in words that would be acceptable to a conservative nation. By defining themselves in the traditional role of housekeeper, they could deflect criticisms that they were acting out of their proper sphere. They could use the vocabulary of mothers and housewives to convince others that they were ideally equipped with the required temperament and experience to clean up the nation, starting with their own neighborhood, then expanding into the city and beyond. Thus the term came into existence. It was a clever way for women to claim a public voice while maintaining the outward appearance of continuing in their traditional role. Ironically, however, by reiterating woman's role as housekeeper, the term also trivialized women's efforts and prevented them from breaking out of the stereotypical definition of housekeeper, which haunts them even today at the beginning of the twenty-first century. Agnes Cooper Gottlieb, an associate professor of communication and women's studies at Seton Hall University, uses the municipal housekeeping movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries as the backdrop for her discussion of a number of women journalists who worked in a variety of roles for newspapers and magazines during the era. After describing the movement as well as the general development of women in journalism through the nineteenth century, she highlights the lives and careers of more than a dozen women who came to adopt much of the movement's rhetoric in their writing. In chapters devoted individually to women who wrote for and about the women's club movement, those who wrote for newspapers, and those who wrote for magazines, Gottlieb describes each one's role as a promoter of reform. She analyzes the journalist's work, highlighting the ways in which she expressed the values and used the strategies of the municipal housekeeping movement to promote her cause. Some of the writers discussed in detail are Jane Cunningham Croly (Jennie June), Helen Winslow, Rheta Childe Dorr, Florence Kelley, and Helen Campbell. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlySame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207