Long-term effects of concussion: Investigating the relationship between sensory gating and motor learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Motor learning relies on the sensorimotor system to interpret, adapt, and integrate sensory inputs to guide motor behavior. A key tenet of the somatosensory system is the ability to inhibit irrelevant information from the CNS to protect higher cortical areas from information overload (sensory gating). Movement and attention can contribute to this process through movement-related gating and relevancy-based facilitation, respectively. Sensory gating occurs at early cortical processing stages and has been shown to be impacted in individuals with a history of concussion. Past work from our lab found a delay in relevancy-based facilitation in a group with a history of concussion compared to healthy controls. The current work aimed to understand the behavioral manifestations that result from disruptions to relevancy-based gating modulations at early cortical processing stages in the concussion population. A total of 40 participants were recruited to participate in this study with 25 in the concussion history group (Hx) and 15 in the control group (No-Hx). This study consisted of 2 experimental sessions that occurred 24 hours apart. During session 1, somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) were elicited via median nerve stimulation while subjects performed a task that manipulated their focus of attention toward or away from proprioceptive feedback. Subjects then completed an implicit motor sequence learning task relying solely on proprioceptive cues. Individuals performed a retention test at session 2, followed by a visual attentional blink (AB) task. The AB is a phenomenon elicited by the rapid presentation of sequential targets which results in reduced accuracy of detecting the second target at the expense of detecting the first target. The No-Hx performed the implicit learning task at session 1 and a retention test at session 2 because SEP and AB data were compared to control data previously collected by this lab. SEP data replicated past work showing an absence of relevancy-based facilitation at early cortical processing stages (N20-P27) that emerged at later processing stages. Our Hx showed evidence of relevancy-based facilitation at either the P50-N70 or the N70-P100 consistent with past work that found this to occur at the N70-P100. Performance on the learning task was not significantly different between the Hx and No-Hx. Performance on the AB task revealed greater AB magnitude in the Hx compared to the No-Hx. Collectively, these results suggest a compensatory strategy in the Hx that enables them to learn to the same degree as controls. However, when the attentional system is taxed with high temporal demands there are decrements in performance. These results are of particular importance given that these individuals are at an increased risk of sustaining subsequent concussions, and musculoskeletal injuries.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».