Under Their Own Laws: How the Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation created a new marine protected area – without the federal government’s approval
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On June 21, 2022, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais, a First Nation on the Pacific coast of Canada, unilaterally declared the Gitdisdzu Lugyeks marine protected area (MPA) in their territorial waters of Kitasu Bay. Whether they have the legal authority to create that protected area, however, is a difficult question to answer. The Constitution Act of Canada protects Indigenous people’s fundamental rights to fishing, logging, and land, but technically they remain subjects of the Canadian government. For the Kitasoo/Xai’xais this system is especially frustrating, since like many other Pacific coast nations, they have never signed a treaty with the Canadian government. The eventual goal, then, for the new MPA is to reach a co-management agreement, where the Kitasoo/Xai’xais and Canadian government establish overlapping MPAs in Kitasu Bay and share authority over the bay’s resources. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais have their traditional knowledge and holistic understanding of their territory that is needed to protect and manage Kitasu Bay. Meanwhile, the Canadian government has far-reaching political power and a national perspective that the Kitasoo/Xai’xais lack. Combining these assets could do great things for the bay. By declaring their MPA, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais are, in a sense, just getting a head-start on this process. They still want the federal government involved, after all. They just felt that they couldn’t wait any longer. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais have been fighting for decades to keep their environment intact. They have had to use every tool at their disposal – protests, lawsuits, and industry alliances – to maintain their way of living. Now, the Gitdisdzu Lugyeks MPA represents a new opportunity: if the Canadian government comes to the table, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais will have a renewed chance to safeguard their resources under their own laws and practices, just as they did before European colonization. They are using a vast wealth of traditional knowledge, bolstered by decades of their own scientific research, to guide their management practices and ensure their waters and resources will still be there for generations to come. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais, however, are striving for something bigger than themselves: they believe this MPA can demonstrate the power of Indigenous-led conservation both in Canada and around the world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».