MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7044000811

Under Their Own Laws: How the Kitasoo/Xai’xais First Nation created a new marine protected area – without the federal government’s approval

2023· dissertation· en· W7044000811 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousGovernment (linguistics)TreatyConstitutionMarine protected areaFirst nationIndigenous rightsPolitics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On June 21, 2022, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais, a First Nation on the Pacific coast of Canada, unilaterally declared the Gitdisdzu Lugyeks marine protected area (MPA) in their territorial waters of Kitasu Bay. Whether they have the legal authority to create that protected area, however, is a difficult question to answer. The Constitution Act of Canada protects Indigenous people’s fundamental rights to fishing, logging, and land, but technically they remain subjects of the Canadian government. For the Kitasoo/Xai’xais this system is especially frustrating, since like many other Pacific coast nations, they have never signed a treaty with the Canadian government. The eventual goal, then, for the new MPA is to reach a co-management agreement, where the Kitasoo/Xai’xais and Canadian government establish overlapping MPAs in Kitasu Bay and share authority over the bay’s resources. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais have their traditional knowledge and holistic understanding of their territory that is needed to protect and manage Kitasu Bay. Meanwhile, the Canadian government has far-reaching political power and a national perspective that the Kitasoo/Xai’xais lack. Combining these assets could do great things for the bay. By declaring their MPA, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais are, in a sense, just getting a head-start on this process. They still want the federal government involved, after all. They just felt that they couldn’t wait any longer. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais have been fighting for decades to keep their environment intact. They have had to use every tool at their disposal – protests, lawsuits, and industry alliances – to maintain their way of living. Now, the Gitdisdzu Lugyeks MPA represents a new opportunity: if the Canadian government comes to the table, the Kitasoo/Xai’xais will have a renewed chance to safeguard their resources under their own laws and practices, just as they did before European colonization. They are using a vast wealth of traditional knowledge, bolstered by decades of their own scientific research, to guide their management practices and ensure their waters and resources will still be there for generations to come. The Kitasoo/Xai’xais, however, are striving for something bigger than themselves: they believe this MPA can demonstrate the power of Indigenous-led conservation both in Canada and around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.572
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)Same topicPacific and Southeast Asian StudiesFrench-language works237,207