MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7046691587

Effects of Soil Management on Wheat Composition

2012· article· en· W7046691587 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFertilizerNutrient managementStarchWheat flourComposition (language)NutrientCultivarManureGlutenSoil management
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

There is growing demand for locally and organically grown food. This demand has spurred efforts to produce flour and breads made from wheat grown locally in Maine. Unfortunately millers and bakers do not have access to enough locally grown organic wheat to meet their needs. New England farmers have a tremendous opportunity to discover ways to supply organic bread wheat for this rapidly growing market. In addition it is important to understand how soil management practices and genetics affect wheat's nutrient composition for human health and bread-making purposes. The fructan content, starch content, and gluten content and strength are important characteristics of bread quality. The oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and free phenolic content have a potential impact on human health. The objectives of this research were to assess how wheat cultivar, soil management practices, and location impact bread-making and nutritional quality of wheat grown in Maine. The wheat was planted in a split-split plot design, with soil management as the main plot, wheat variety as the subplot, and the nitrogen fertilizer rate as the sub-subplot. Two cultivars were studied in this experiment - AC Barrie and AC Walton. Four soil treatments were evaluated: "amended" that received manure as a nitrogen (N) source, and non-amended that received synthetic fertilizer. Within the non-amended treatment, 4 rates of fertilizer were evaluated: 60, 75, 90, and 105 kg of N per hectare. Starch content, SDS sedimentation, fructan content, and phenolic content were all within expected ranges compared to previously published values. ORAC values on average were a little lower than other published data. No significant differences were seen in starch content, sedimentation volumes, fructan content, or ORAC values of wheat between cultivars or type of soil management treatment. This suggests that the increased organic matter and the slower release of N from the accumulated amendments of the amended plots, amount of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer added or cultivar tested did not significantly affect these parameters. There were significant differences seen between treatments for some of the phenolic acid measurements and these differences were due to the fact that as increased levels of nitrogen fertilizer were added to the wheat, phenolic acid levels were correspondingly lowered. Wheat crude protein content was negatively correlated with SDS sedimentation volumes, which indicates that as the protein levels of the wheat increased, the protein quality potentially decreased. The free phenolic content positively correlated with the ORAC values, indicating that the higher the phenolic content the more potential antioxidant capacity. Regression analysis of the amount of nitrogen added indicated that each increased amount of applied nitrogen fertilizer caused the protein content of the wheat to increase and the phenolic acid content of the wheat to decrease. However this increased protein content did not necessarily lead to increased breadmaking quality, and the higher levels of nitrogen fertilizer applied to increase crude protein content also simultaneously decreased one of the components beneficial to human health. Overall the data suggest that the cultivar and soil management treatment had little effect on the parameters measured.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,778
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207