Effects of Soil Management on Wheat Composition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is growing demand for locally and organically grown food. This demand has spurred efforts to produce flour and breads made from wheat grown locally in Maine. Unfortunately millers and bakers do not have access to enough locally grown organic wheat to meet their needs. New England farmers have a tremendous opportunity to discover ways to supply organic bread wheat for this rapidly growing market. In addition it is important to understand how soil management practices and genetics affect wheat's nutrient composition for human health and bread-making purposes. The fructan content, starch content, and gluten content and strength are important characteristics of bread quality. The oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and free phenolic content have a potential impact on human health. The objectives of this research were to assess how wheat cultivar, soil management practices, and location impact bread-making and nutritional quality of wheat grown in Maine. The wheat was planted in a split-split plot design, with soil management as the main plot, wheat variety as the subplot, and the nitrogen fertilizer rate as the sub-subplot. Two cultivars were studied in this experiment - AC Barrie and AC Walton. Four soil treatments were evaluated: "amended" that received manure as a nitrogen (N) source, and non-amended that received synthetic fertilizer. Within the non-amended treatment, 4 rates of fertilizer were evaluated: 60, 75, 90, and 105 kg of N per hectare. Starch content, SDS sedimentation, fructan content, and phenolic content were all within expected ranges compared to previously published values. ORAC values on average were a little lower than other published data. No significant differences were seen in starch content, sedimentation volumes, fructan content, or ORAC values of wheat between cultivars or type of soil management treatment. This suggests that the increased organic matter and the slower release of N from the accumulated amendments of the amended plots, amount of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer added or cultivar tested did not significantly affect these parameters. There were significant differences seen between treatments for some of the phenolic acid measurements and these differences were due to the fact that as increased levels of nitrogen fertilizer were added to the wheat, phenolic acid levels were correspondingly lowered. Wheat crude protein content was negatively correlated with SDS sedimentation volumes, which indicates that as the protein levels of the wheat increased, the protein quality potentially decreased. The free phenolic content positively correlated with the ORAC values, indicating that the higher the phenolic content the more potential antioxidant capacity. Regression analysis of the amount of nitrogen added indicated that each increased amount of applied nitrogen fertilizer caused the protein content of the wheat to increase and the phenolic acid content of the wheat to decrease. However this increased protein content did not necessarily lead to increased breadmaking quality, and the higher levels of nitrogen fertilizer applied to increase crude protein content also simultaneously decreased one of the components beneficial to human health. Overall the data suggest that the cultivar and soil management treatment had little effect on the parameters measured.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it