Génération de politiques transactionnelles pour les agrégateurs de réponse à la demande
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The increase in energy needs of the growing global population and the concern with its associated Greenhouse Gas emissions cause significant challenges for conventional power systems.In this regard, the smart grid concept is proposed as a key enabler for clean energy generation and efficient energy consumption.Under the smart grid paradigm, the emergence of transactive energy systems brings about a remarkable opportunity for realizing a modernized power grid through enhanced Energy Management Systems.Particularly, these new systems offer innovative Demand Response (DR) programs in order to improve energy efficiency and flexibility and facilitate renewable resources and energy storage integration.This is achieved by leveraging advanced metering infrastructure, two-way communication networks, and distributed control systems.The smart grid also frames a group of mechanisms for DR characterized by generating incentives or pricing policies in an adaptive and more real-time manner.Consumers can react by modifying their load profiles in order to minimize energy costs while maintaining comfort desires.On the grid side, the operator can manage system congestion and minimize operational costs by reducing the peak demand and deferring the construction of new power plants and power delivery systems.However, these DR programs face significant challenges in terms of modeling and management of decision-support information in dynamic and non-homogeneous environments.Indeed, the incomplete information on the dynamics of the behind-the-meter resources, the inherent issues of user data confidentiality, the potential failures in the communication channels, and the emergence of intelligent loads (including storage) create a complex and uncertain environment for the decision-making process.As a result, a new entity is emerging, the demand response aggregator.This aggregator acts as a mediator between consumers and the electricity market to explore the flexibility iv opportunities offered by the residential sector.This new entity will then seek to offer benefits to both parties (distributors and users) by exploiting the policies of demand response programs.The mentioned role translates into an interaction between players seeking to maximize their gains and thus ends up being framed by game theory.However, the various sources of uncertainty mentioned above considerably complicate the process of generating optimal policies.With this in mind, reinforcement learning methods emerge, offering the possibility of managing uncertainty through a trial-and-error process.In other words, this approach takes advantage of the interactions between the various players in the system, in order to achieve an optimized generation of transactive policies.This thesis proposes to develop an automated agent (meeting the needs of network managers) for generating optimized transactive policies through interactions in a residential environment.The proposed approach considers a transactive environment composed of rational residential agents and a demand response aggregator agent interacting in a game theoretic framework.The aggregator's adaptability and ability to handle uncertainty are considered through reinforcement learning techniques.The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in managing residential consumption.The aggregator agent is able to offer economic incentives to users through the development of pricing policies while respecting users' privacy, in order to exploit the potential of residential flexibility.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,013 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».