MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7047398409

Génération de politiques transactionnelles pour les agrégateurs de réponse à la demande

2024· other· fr· W7047398409 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLe dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) · 2024
Typeother
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHydro-QuébecUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Field (mathematics)Government (linguistics)Perspective (graphical)Work (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase in energy needs of the growing global population and the concern with its associated Greenhouse Gas emissions cause significant challenges for conventional power systems.In this regard, the smart grid concept is proposed as a key enabler for clean energy generation and efficient energy consumption.Under the smart grid paradigm, the emergence of transactive energy systems brings about a remarkable opportunity for realizing a modernized power grid through enhanced Energy Management Systems.Particularly, these new systems offer innovative Demand Response (DR) programs in order to improve energy efficiency and flexibility and facilitate renewable resources and energy storage integration.This is achieved by leveraging advanced metering infrastructure, two-way communication networks, and distributed control systems.The smart grid also frames a group of mechanisms for DR characterized by generating incentives or pricing policies in an adaptive and more real-time manner.Consumers can react by modifying their load profiles in order to minimize energy costs while maintaining comfort desires.On the grid side, the operator can manage system congestion and minimize operational costs by reducing the peak demand and deferring the construction of new power plants and power delivery systems.However, these DR programs face significant challenges in terms of modeling and management of decision-support information in dynamic and non-homogeneous environments.Indeed, the incomplete information on the dynamics of the behind-the-meter resources, the inherent issues of user data confidentiality, the potential failures in the communication channels, and the emergence of intelligent loads (including storage) create a complex and uncertain environment for the decision-making process.As a result, a new entity is emerging, the demand response aggregator.This aggregator acts as a mediator between consumers and the electricity market to explore the flexibility iv opportunities offered by the residential sector.This new entity will then seek to offer benefits to both parties (distributors and users) by exploiting the policies of demand response programs.The mentioned role translates into an interaction between players seeking to maximize their gains and thus ends up being framed by game theory.However, the various sources of uncertainty mentioned above considerably complicate the process of generating optimal policies.With this in mind, reinforcement learning methods emerge, offering the possibility of managing uncertainty through a trial-and-error process.In other words, this approach takes advantage of the interactions between the various players in the system, in order to achieve an optimized generation of transactive policies.This thesis proposes to develop an automated agent (meeting the needs of network managers) for generating optimized transactive policies through interactions in a residential environment.The proposed approach considers a transactive environment composed of rational residential agents and a demand response aggregator agent interacting in a game theoretic framework.The aggregator's adaptability and ability to handle uncertainty are considered through reinforcement learning techniques.The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in managing residential consumption.The aggregator agent is able to offer economic incentives to users through the development of pricing policies while respecting users' privacy, in order to exploit the potential of residential flexibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0320.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLe dépôt institutionnel (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières)Same topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207