Investigating New Zealand workers' willingness to provide expatriates with information and social support in the New Zealand workplace : a thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Psychology at Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
New Zealand organisations are required to ‘import’ expatriates to fill skills shortages in \nthe labour market caused by ‘brain drain’. A major contributor towards retaining \nexpatriates in their New Zealand jobs for as long as possible is the amount of help, such \nas information and social support, expatriates receive from their local co-workers. The \npresent study set out to explore New Zealand workers’ willingness to provide \ninformation and social support to expatriates, and subsequently understand New \nZealand workers’ psychological motivations for providing help to expatriates in New \nZealand workplaces. Specifically, the present study tested the similarity of expatriates’ \ncountries-of-origin to New Zealand, the social dominance of expatriates’ countries-oforigin \nand the threat that expatriates pose to finite work-related resources as \npsychological motivators for providing or withholding help to expatriates. Fifty-six \nSubject Matter Experts who had approximately 13 years experience with observing \nrelationships in New Zealand workplaces completed an online scenario-based \nquestionnaire. The questionnaire presented seven fictitious expatriates from Britain, \nAustralia, Canada, South Africa, USA, Japan and India, and asked participants to \nestimate the typical helping preferences of New Zealand workers towards the above \nexpatriates. Kendall’s Tau rank correlation coefficients (!) indicated that, as suggested \nby the present sample of Subject Matter Experts, New Zealand workers’ willingness to \nprovide information was related to their willingness to provide social support for \nexpatriates from Australia, Canada, South Africa and USA; but not for expatriates from \nBritain, Japan and India. Overall, as rated by the present sample of Subject Matter \nExperts, Sign tests indicated that New Zealand workers were most willing to help a) \nBritish and Australian expatriates, then b) Canadian, South African and American \nexpatriates, and lastly, c) Japanese and Indian expatriates. Kendall’s tau rank correlation \ncoefficients (!) indicated that the above pattern of preferences for helping was largely \ninfluenced by similarity and threat of expatriates; specifically, New Zealand workers, as \nrated by Subject Matter Experts, were more willing to help more similar and more \nthreatening expatriates. In the present study, social dominance of expatriates’ countriesof- \norigin was not rated as a significant predictor of New Zealand workers’ willingness \nto help expatriates. The discussion presents various implications for stakeholders \ninvolved with expatriate transfers to New Zealand.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».