INFORMED CONSENT IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Contributors -- Foreword / Richard Smith -- Introduction / Len Doyal and Jeffrey S. Tobias -- Pt. I. Informed consent and medical research: a historical perspective -- Ch. 1. The Nuremberg code and the Helsinki declaration -- Ch. 2. A historical introduction to the requirement of obtaining informed consent from research participants / Baruch A Brody -- Ch. 3. Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial / Paul Weindling -- Ch. 4. Henry K. Beecher and Maurice Pappworth: informed consent in human experimentation and the physicians' response / Paul J. Edelson -- Ch. 5. Extracts from Pappworth and Beecher -- Introduction to Beecher's "Ethics and clinical research" / Len Doyal -- Ethics and clinical research / Henry K Beecher -- Commentary on "Ethics and clinical research" / John P Bunker -- An introduction to Pappworth's Human guinea pigs / Jeffrey S. Tobias -- Human guinea pigs / M.H. Pappworth -- Commentary on Human guinea pigs / Stephen Lock -- Ch. 6. Learning from unethical research / Paul McNeill and Naomi Pfeffer -- Pt. II. The BMJ debate: informed consent in medical research -- Ch. 7. Informed consent: the intricacies / Richard Smith -- Ch. 8. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial / Martin Dennis, Suzanne O'Rourke, Jim Slattery, Trish Staniforth, and Charles Warlow -- No consent means not treating the patient with respect (commentary) / Sheila A.M. McLean - - Why we didn't ask patients for their consent (commentary) -- Martin Dennis -- Ch. 9. Does HIV status influence the outcome of patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit? A prospective double blind study / Satish Bhagwanjee, David J.J. Muckart, Prakash M. Jeena, Prushini Moodley -- Failing to seek patient consent to research is always wrong (commentary) / Rajendra Kale and Laxmi-Kunj -- Why we did not seek informed consent before testing patients for HIV (commentary) / Satish Bhagwanjee, David J.J. Muckart, Prakash M. Jeena, Prushini MoodIey -- No simple and absolute ethical rule exists for every conceivable situation (commentary) / Y.K. Seedat -- Ch. 10. Journals should not publish research to which patients have not given fully informed consent - with three exceptions / Len Doyal -- Ch. 11. BMJ's present policy (sometimes approving research in which patients have not given fully informed consent) is wholly correct / Jeffrey S. Tobias -- Ch. 12. Responses to chapters 7-11: letters to the BMJ -- Informed consent: one standard for research, another for clinical practice / Richard Smith -- Letters -- Personal view / Kulsum Winship -- Ch. 13. Other perspectives following the BMJ articles and correspondence -- Informed consent: edging forwards (and backwards) / Richard Smith -- Informed consent: a response to recent correspondence / Len Doyal -- Changing the BMj's position on informed consent would be counterproductive / Jeffrey S. Tobias - - Informed consent -a publisher's duty / Mary Warnock -- Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials / Lisa Power -- Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be published / Heather Goodare -- Thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke: consent can be ethical / Richard I. Lindley -- Informed consent and research / David Benatar and Solomon R. Benatar -- Pt. III. Informed consent and the regulation of medical research -- Ch. 14. International regulation, infonned consent and medical research -- The UK perspective / C.M. Foster -- A perspective from the USA and Canada / Eric M. Meslin -- The European perspective / Richard Nicholson - - Ch. 15. Informed consent, medical research and the competent adult / Sheila A.M. McLean -- Ch. 16. Informed consent and clinical research with children / Jonathan Montgomery -- Ch. 17. Informed consent and clinical research in psychiatry / Phil Fennell -- Ch. 18. Informed consent and surgical research / Alan G. Johnson -- Ch. 19. Informed consent and genetic research / Ruth Chadwick -- Ch. 20. Informed consent and HIV: public health versus private lives / Rebecca Bennett -- Ch. 21. Informed consent and research on assisted conception / Bobbie Farsides and Heather Draper -- Ch. 22. Informed consent for access to medical records for health services research / Brian Hurwitz -- Ch. 23. Informed consent, medical research, and healthy volunteers / S.M. Louise Abrams and G.A. Browning -- Pt. IV. The limits of informed consent in medical research: rights, duties, skills -- Ch. 24. Informed consent and human rights in medical research / Ann Sommerville -- Ch. 25. 'Fully' informed consent, clinical trials, and the boundaries of therapeutic discretion / Raanan Gillon -- Ch. 26. Double standards on informed consent to treatment / Iain Chalmers and Richard I. Lindley -- Ch. 27. Rights and responsibilities of individuals participating in medical research / John Harris and Simon Woods -- Ch. 28. Informed consent in medical research: the consumer's view / Naomi Pfeffer - - Ch. 29. The role of effective communication in obtaining informed consent / Angela Hall -- Ch. 30. Informed consent and medical education / Chris Ward -- Pt. V. Conclusion -- Ch. 31. The moral importance of informed consent in medical research: concluding reflections / Len Doyal -- Ch. 32. Contemporary challenges in clinical research: paying lip service to informed consent, or a genuine shift of gear? / Jeffrey S. Tobias -- Index
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,140 | 0,356 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,021 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,019 | 0,027 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,049 | 0,060 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».