Review of <i>Voices in the Wind: A Waterton-Glacier Anthology</i> Edited by Barbara Grinder, Valerie HaigBrown,and Kevin Van Tighem
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Voices in the Wind is a diverse collection of personal essays, anecdotes, profiles, and journalism contributed by some of the participants in the three Waterton-Glacier International Writers' Conferences held in 1995, 1997, and 1999. Offering three days of writing, editing, and publishing workshops, the conference also includes field trips with local experts and encourages participants to write and publish articles about issues relating to the ecology of the region. Voices in the Wind collects some of these articles by both Canadian and American conferees. Several are full-time journalists, editors, or photographers, but the majority work as biologists, wildlife technicians, range ecologists, agrologists, hydrologists, and nurses, writing when they can. The anthology covers the geographical territory of the southwestern Alberta and north central Montana prairies, the region immediately surrounding the Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park, and the area's parks themselves. Its seven sections deal with some of the region's notable places and inhabitants, its hiking trails and mountain and montane ecosystems, bears, living in nature, and ethics. Several essays in the first two sections describe places striking for their intersection of human and natural history, like the Bar U Ranch, Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, and the 1995 flood in Pincher Creek, while others memorialize intriguing individuals- people like Montana's Mary Ground (1882-1990), a.k.a. Grass Woman, whose life spanned the traditional nomadic Blackfoot way of making a living, the transitional period when Indians were forced to abandon their traditional economy, up to the end of the twentieth century, as well as the renegade Glacier park warden and poacher Joe Cosley and the story of his dangerous capture. Hikers may zero in on the third and fourth sections, which recount hikes along the area's trails. Connoisseurs of nature writing will savor the essay by master storyteller and writer Andy Russell, who sets his account of a hike to the summit of Goat Ridge in the context of geological prehistory. Kevin Van Tighem's well-crafted prose never fails to enlighten, and his two essays on whitebark and limber pines and on the ranches adjacent to Waterton Park are no exception. Van Tighem quotes Nature Conservancy of Canada's western field director Larry Simpson's statement that if the biological diversity of ranch country is lost through real estate speculation, the "cultural heritage and natural heritage of western North America could potentially undergo a transformation in the next twenty years that will be as profound and long reaching as the loss of the buffalo. Different yes: but no less significant." Hard-hitting and visionary journalist Andrew Nikiforuk's "Our Home and Native Land" contains the sobering information that "Road densities in the boreal [forest of Alberta] are now eight times higher than that recommended by the U.S. Forest Service to conserve big game animals such as grizzlies .... In fact, only five percent of Alberta's forests now stand in blocks greater than nine square kilometres. A nine square kilometre block fits nicely into downtown Calgary and takes up no more than one-tenth the size of the city. Like Brazil, Alberta has eaten its wilderness capital with gusto." As someone who struggled and failed for four years to live in a part of Canada where a "hike" lasted only about twenty minutes before one emerged on the other side of a block this size, I shuddered reading this statistic. John Russell's story of "Encounters with Bears" on and near his land just north of Waterton may alter readers' views of these mammals, particularly his surprising description of two bears, a black and a grizzly, wrestling, feeding, and ambling about the country together as if starring in a buddy movie.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».