Review of <i>Voices in the Wind: A Waterton-Glacier Anthology</i> Edited by Barbara Grinder, Valerie HaigBrown,and Kevin Van Tighem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Voices in the Wind is a diverse collection of personal essays, anecdotes, profiles, and journalism contributed by some of the participants in the three Waterton-Glacier International Writers' Conferences held in 1995, 1997, and 1999. Offering three days of writing, editing, and publishing workshops, the conference also includes field trips with local experts and encourages participants to write and publish articles about issues relating to the ecology of the region. Voices in the Wind collects some of these articles by both Canadian and American conferees. Several are full-time journalists, editors, or photographers, but the majority work as biologists, wildlife technicians, range ecologists, agrologists, hydrologists, and nurses, writing when they can. The anthology covers the geographical territory of the southwestern Alberta and north central Montana prairies, the region immediately surrounding the Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park, and the area's parks themselves. Its seven sections deal with some of the region's notable places and inhabitants, its hiking trails and mountain and montane ecosystems, bears, living in nature, and ethics. Several essays in the first two sections describe places striking for their intersection of human and natural history, like the Bar U Ranch, Writing-on-Stone Provincial Park, and the 1995 flood in Pincher Creek, while others memorialize intriguing individuals- people like Montana's Mary Ground (1882-1990), a.k.a. Grass Woman, whose life spanned the traditional nomadic Blackfoot way of making a living, the transitional period when Indians were forced to abandon their traditional economy, up to the end of the twentieth century, as well as the renegade Glacier park warden and poacher Joe Cosley and the story of his dangerous capture. Hikers may zero in on the third and fourth sections, which recount hikes along the area's trails. Connoisseurs of nature writing will savor the essay by master storyteller and writer Andy Russell, who sets his account of a hike to the summit of Goat Ridge in the context of geological prehistory. Kevin Van Tighem's well-crafted prose never fails to enlighten, and his two essays on whitebark and limber pines and on the ranches adjacent to Waterton Park are no exception. Van Tighem quotes Nature Conservancy of Canada's western field director Larry Simpson's statement that if the biological diversity of ranch country is lost through real estate speculation, the "cultural heritage and natural heritage of western North America could potentially undergo a transformation in the next twenty years that will be as profound and long reaching as the loss of the buffalo. Different yes: but no less significant." Hard-hitting and visionary journalist Andrew Nikiforuk's "Our Home and Native Land" contains the sobering information that "Road densities in the boreal [forest of Alberta] are now eight times higher than that recommended by the U.S. Forest Service to conserve big game animals such as grizzlies .... In fact, only five percent of Alberta's forests now stand in blocks greater than nine square kilometres. A nine square kilometre block fits nicely into downtown Calgary and takes up no more than one-tenth the size of the city. Like Brazil, Alberta has eaten its wilderness capital with gusto." As someone who struggled and failed for four years to live in a part of Canada where a "hike" lasted only about twenty minutes before one emerged on the other side of a block this size, I shuddered reading this statistic. John Russell's story of "Encounters with Bears" on and near his land just north of Waterton may alter readers' views of these mammals, particularly his surprising description of two bears, a black and a grizzly, wrestling, feeding, and ambling about the country together as if starring in a buddy movie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".