MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W7052627060

Science communication: Bridging the gap between theory and practise

2001· other· en· W7052627060 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2001
Typeother
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueMagnetic confinement fusion research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBridging (networking)Field (mathematics)Mode (computer interface)Context (archaeology)
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The 6th Public Communication of Science and Technology network conference will be held at CERN on 1-3 Febraury 2001. Scientists and communication professionals will analyse the state of the art of science communication and the new perception people have about science in the media from newspapers to the Web. Will communication be able to bridge the gap between Science and Society? What is the impact of science communication on the public? How do novel means of communications change the perception of science for the general public? These and other interesting questions will be addressed at the 6th Public Communication of Science and Technology Meeting, to be held at CERN on 1-3 February 2001. More than 250 people from all over the world are expected to attend the conference which will be an important meeting place for communication professionals covering the social, political, technical and cultural aspects of science and technology communication. Georges Boixader after Gary Larsson. The conference is promoted by the PCST network (see box), a loose international organisation of individuals interested in all aspects of the relationship between science and the public. What is the PCST network? The International Network on Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) was born in 1989 after the first International Meeting on Public Scientific Communication that took place at Poitiers, France. The 130 participants from 14 countries decided to meet again to discuss the public's growing need for more information about scientific and technological matters and all the problems and developments concerning science communication. The aim of the network is to multiply opportunities for exchange and co-operation among both researchers and professionals who work in the many diverse but complementary fields of public communication of science and technology. It especially intends to facilitate these interactions on an international basis. In the past PCST conferences achievements have been considerable and now the PCST members intend to evaluate those achievements in order to find a better synergy among the various aspects of the relationship between science and public. The main aim of the conference is 'bridging the gap between theory and practise' with the goal of focusing attention on the impact of science communication on the public. All the themes chosen for the plenary sessions of the programme as well as for the afternoon workshops reflect the need for more cross-fertilization between academia and practise in science communication and the impact of the one upon the another. The sociological and political aspects of science communication will be covered from several different points of view. These include those of André Giordan (Laboratoire de Didactique et Epistémologie des Sciences de l'Université de Genève), who will talk about communication and scientific communities, and David Dickson, ('Nature', UK), who will deal with the impact on public opinion of the scientific press. Great attention will be dedicated to research and practise in science museums: the evaluation of the success of science museums and science centres and their impact on the public will be analized. The discussion will be enriched by the participation of Hans Peter Peters, from the Deutsches Museum in Munich, and Walter Staveloz who will talk about ECSITE, the international network of museums and science centres. Another main theme of the programme is novel means of communicating science to the public, and no venue could be better chosen than CERN, the birthplace of the WWW. Locating one of the PCST conferences on one of the largest scientific laboratory in the world also reflects the need for integrating scientists into the communication process. PCST 2001 will also offer the CERN community of scientists the possibility of exchanging ideas on the public communication of science with experts in the field. Bernard Schiele (University of Québec, Montréal) will talk about the process from science centres to virtual schools and Pierre Fayard (University of Poitiers and a PCST network scientific committee member) will deal with science on line as a new frontier in science communication. All interested CERN members are invited to the plenary sessions (morning only, from 9 to 12.30) in the CERN main auditorium and to the public events described. No registration is required. Access to the afternoon workshop is restricted to the registered and paying participants. For more information and an updated version of the programme please consult the conference website: http://www.cern.ch/PCST2001 Satellite events Thanks to the presence of so many communication professionals some public meetings have been organised. 'What does Science do for Society?' ('Que fait la science pour la société?') is the title of the public debate that will take place on the evening of Friday Feb 2, at 8 pm in the Arditi-Wilsdorf room, 1, avenue du Mail, Geneva. Charles Kleiber, Swiss minister of Science and Research, Mariano Gago, Portuguese minister of Research, Catherine Cesarsky, Director General of ESO (European Southern Observatory), Alain Vaissade, Mayor of Geneva and Robert Cailliau, co-inventor of the WWW will participate in the discussion. The event is supported by the Ville de Genève, Etat de Genève, Euroscience Leman and the Fondation pour Genève. On Saturday afternoon also some public events will take place in the Restaurant 1, Building 501, at the cafetaria, at 2 p.m., Science in the Pub, a special Australian performance mixing science with Australian beer served to the audience and at 3.30 p.m. the Cabaret Pasteur, a French sample of entertainment with a scientific touch.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,048
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Méthodes · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,959
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,254

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0480,061
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0070,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,050
Communication savante0,0410,069
Science ouverte0,0030,016
Intégrité de la recherche0,0160,014
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0230,006

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,299
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreMéthodes

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)Même sujetMagnetic confinement fusion researchTravaux en français237 207