Utilizing Ground-Penetrating Radar to Estimate the Spatial Distribution of Snow Depth over Lake Ice in Canada’s Sub-Arctic
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the expected rise in air temperature, it becomes important to understand how snow will respond in different climate scenarios. The presence of snow over lake ice largely influences the ice thickness, and as Canada’s Arctic and sub-arctic regions are experiencing warming at twice the global rate, concerns rise as changes in the snowpack will significantly impact northern communities that rely on lake ice as a means of transportation, source for drinking water, and feeding their families. The distribution of snow depth is highly sensitive to changes in climate over time, as such a slight increase in air temperature or change in precipitation can substantially alter snowpack dynamics, which in-turn, directly impacts the rate of lake ice growth. The heterogeneity of snow depth over lake ice is driven by wind redistribution and snowpack metamorphism which creates an inconsistent ice thickness across the lake. Currently, daily snow depth measurements are represented as one value, collected at a weather station on land, near lake shorelines, but previous studies show that this data is not representative of the distribution of snow across different landscapes, more specifically lake ice. Due to the exposed nature of lakes, it is shown that snow depth will be redistributed greatly over lake ice, as there is a lack of vegetation compared to land surfaces with differences in topography. To identify the snow spatial distribution, extensive snow depth measurements must be collected across the entire lake. However, the collection of accurate snow depth measurements over lake ice is challenging and requires a great deal of time spent in the field. Studies have explored the use of remote sensing techniques to map snow distribution over land, however our understanding of such over lake ice is minimal.\nAccurate measurements of the spatial distribution of snow depth over lake ice is limited due to logistical difficulties in manual measurement techniques (i.e., ruler, snow depth probe). This study presents the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and in-situ observations (snow depth and density) to develop a systematic method to estimate the spatial distribution of snow depth over lake ice. Focused on four lakes located in the North Slave Region, Northwest Territories (Landing Lake, Finger Lake, Vee Lake, Long Lake) the snow depth is derived using GPR two-way travel time. Through utilizing a combination of ground-based techniques, this study proposed a methodology to ease the collection process required to get accurate snow depth measurements on a larger spatial scale than current methods allow. The findings of this thesis will benefit the snow and ice community as we can increase our availability of accurate snow depth data over lake ice through an efficient method of collecting larger snow depth datasets. Specifically, with the availability of snow depth data over lake ice, the accuracy of thermodynamic lake ice model can be improved significantly.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».