MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7053385964

Utilizing Ground-Penetrating Radar to Estimate the Spatial Distribution of Snow Depth over Lake Ice in Canada’s Sub-Arctic

2023· article· en· W7053385964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowSnowpackCryosphereSnow fieldPrecipitationMeltwaterArctic
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the expected rise in air temperature, it becomes important to understand how snow will respond in different climate scenarios. The presence of snow over lake ice largely influences the ice thickness, and as Canada’s Arctic and sub-arctic regions are experiencing warming at twice the global rate, concerns rise as changes in the snowpack will significantly impact northern communities that rely on lake ice as a means of transportation, source for drinking water, and feeding their families. The distribution of snow depth is highly sensitive to changes in climate over time, as such a slight increase in air temperature or change in precipitation can substantially alter snowpack dynamics, which in-turn, directly impacts the rate of lake ice growth. The heterogeneity of snow depth over lake ice is driven by wind redistribution and snowpack metamorphism which creates an inconsistent ice thickness across the lake. Currently, daily snow depth measurements are represented as one value, collected at a weather station on land, near lake shorelines, but previous studies show that this data is not representative of the distribution of snow across different landscapes, more specifically lake ice. Due to the exposed nature of lakes, it is shown that snow depth will be redistributed greatly over lake ice, as there is a lack of vegetation compared to land surfaces with differences in topography. To identify the snow spatial distribution, extensive snow depth measurements must be collected across the entire lake. However, the collection of accurate snow depth measurements over lake ice is challenging and requires a great deal of time spent in the field. Studies have explored the use of remote sensing techniques to map snow distribution over land, however our understanding of such over lake ice is minimal.\nAccurate measurements of the spatial distribution of snow depth over lake ice is limited due to logistical difficulties in manual measurement techniques (i.e., ruler, snow depth probe). This study presents the use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and in-situ observations (snow depth and density) to develop a systematic method to estimate the spatial distribution of snow depth over lake ice. Focused on four lakes located in the North Slave Region, Northwest Territories (Landing Lake, Finger Lake, Vee Lake, Long Lake) the snow depth is derived using GPR two-way travel time. Through utilizing a combination of ground-based techniques, this study proposed a methodology to ease the collection process required to get accurate snow depth measurements on a larger spatial scale than current methods allow. The findings of this thesis will benefit the snow and ice community as we can increase our availability of accurate snow depth data over lake ice through an efficient method of collecting larger snow depth datasets. Specifically, with the availability of snow depth data over lake ice, the accuracy of thermodynamic lake ice model can be improved significantly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholars Commons (Wilfrid Laurier University)→Same topicNuclear reactor physics and engineering→French-language works237,207→