COVID-19 and the shift towards citizens' panels
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In light of the looming crisis facing liberal democracy, this collection of 22 special national and regional reports, synthesised by a general report, delves into this crisis. The reports first examine the common characteristics and manifestations of this crisis such as corruption, weakness of institutions, loss of the sense of the common good, etc. More specific factors are also highlighted, such as the absence of a democratic tradition and distorted relations with European structures, amongst others. After describing their national particularities, the national special reports reveal that the notion of democracy is polysemic. Democracy sometimes refers to the idea of “good government” or even comes from a very specific concept that is alien to Western Theories, as can be seen in China. Liberal democracies are, in fact, mixed systems. Democracy is, essentially, a mode of legitimising power, while liberalism is a mode of limiting power (separation of powers, fundamental rights, etc.). The confusion between these two requirements and, probably, the reinforcement of liberal logic to the detriment of democratic logic, leads to the development of regimes that become, or claim to be, illiberal without renouncing democratic principles and vice versa. The crisis of liberal democracy is also the result of the crisis that affects the concepts in which democracy has developed (for example, People, State, Nation, Power).The interplay between economic and social factors must also be highlighted. Globalisation leads to the dispersion of competences away of the state. Transnational economic regulation means that democratic principles no longer apply to national economic and social policies. Thus, the weakening of democracy can be associated with the breaking of the founding social contract of the welfare state and the delegation of important economic decisions to politically irresponsible actors. With the convergence of these two tendencies, a regime emerges where the will of the majority has little or no influence on substantive decisions related to economic governance.The fact remains that while the concept of liberal democracy presents specificities in these two fields, the political and the institutional, on the one hand, and the economic and the social, on the other, the concept of liberal democracy refers to a Western system in which political, economic and social issues have been combined, democratic principles being corrected, or supplemented, by mechanisms for guaranteeing individual freedoms, and economic liberalism being corrected by social requirements. It is the balance between these requirements, if ever existed, that is today called into question and threatened.This book raises an important question: can we believe in a regeneration of liberal democracy?About the editorsBertrand Mathieu is Professor at the Law School of the Sorbonne-University, Past Senior member of the Council of State (S.E.), Emeritus President of the French Association of Constitutional Law, and member of the Venice Commission (Council of Europe). He is the author of Justice et politique : la déchirure ? (Lextenso 2015) ; Le droit contre la démocratie ? (Lextenso, 2017) (traduction en hongrois, 2018, en espagnol 2021, en russe, 2021, en anglais, Law versus Democracy ? editions EPLO 2023) ; et Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques (LGDJ 2022).George Katrougalos is Professor of Public Law at Democritus University of Greece, former Minister of Foreign Affairs (2019), State Minister for European Affairs (2016-2018), Minister of Labour and Social Solidarity (2015-2016) and State Minister for Administrative Reforms of Greece (2015). He is also the Vice President of the International Association of Constitutional Law. He has published extensively in Greek, American, European and Asian legal reviews on comparative constitutional law, social rights, democracy and neoliberalism and he has taught at several universities in Europe, Asia and the Americas. List of RapporteursWith a General Report by Bertrand Mathieu (Sorbonne – Université Paris 1, France) and George Katrougalos (Democritus University, Greece), and Special Reports by Maurice Adams (Tilburg University, the Netherlands), Astrid Cerón-Padilla (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Efren Chavez-Hernandez (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Kenny Chng (Singapore Management University, Singapore), Lóránt Csink (Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary), Maartje De Visser (Singapore Management University, Singapore), Tímea Drinóczi (Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil), Marcelo Figueiredo (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil), Maaike Geuens (Tilburg University, the Netherlands), Juan Carlos Henao (Universidad Externado de Colombia), Kevin Fredy Hinterberger (Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour, Austria), Konrad Lachmayer (Sigmund Freud University, Austria), César Landa (Université Pontificale Catholique du Pérou), Andreas Marcou (University of Central Lancashire, Cyprus), Tatiana S. Maslovskaya (Université d’Etat biélorusse, Biélorussie), Luca Mezzetti (University of Bologna, Italy), Mo Jihong (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China), Nikolaos Paraskevopoulos (University of Thessaloniki, Greece), Marie-Odile Peyroux-Sissoko (Université de Franche-Comté, France), Ricardo Ramirez-Calvo (Universidad de San Andrés, Argentina), Jana Reschová (Charles University of Prague, Czech Republic), Mathias Revon (Aix-Marseille Université, France), Alejandra Rodríguez Galán (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina), Bianca Selejan-Gutan (‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, Romania), Patrick Taillon (Université Laval, Canada), Elena-Simina Tănăsescu (University of Bucharest, Romania), László Trócsányi (Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church of Hungary) and Tomasz Tulejski (University of Lodz, Poland), and a foreword by Prokopios Pavlopoulos (Former President of the Hellenic Republic).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».