MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7055600330

COVID-19 and the shift towards citizens' panels

2023· article· en· W7055600330 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch portal (Tilburg University) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDemocracyLiberal democracyConfusionLimitingLiberalismEconomic democracyPower (physics)Economic globalization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the looming crisis facing liberal democracy, this collection of 22 special national and regional reports, synthesised by a general report, delves into this crisis. The reports first examine the common characteristics and manifestations of this crisis such as corruption, weakness of institutions, loss of the sense of the common good, etc. More specific factors are also highlighted, such as the absence of a democratic tradition and distorted relations with European structures, amongst others. After describing their national particularities, the national special reports reveal that the notion of democracy is polysemic. Democracy sometimes refers to the idea of “good government” or even comes from a very specific concept that is alien to Western Theories, as can be seen in China. Liberal democracies are, in fact, mixed systems. Democracy is, essentially, a mode of legitimising power, while liberalism is a mode of limiting power (separation of powers, fundamental rights, etc.). The confusion between these two requirements and, probably, the reinforcement of liberal logic to the detriment of democratic logic, leads to the development of regimes that become, or claim to be, illiberal without renouncing democratic principles and vice versa. The crisis of liberal democracy is also the result of the crisis that affects the concepts in which democracy has developed (for example, People, State, Nation, Power).The interplay between economic and social factors must also be highlighted. Globalisation leads to the dispersion of competences away of the state. Transnational economic regulation means that democratic principles no longer apply to national economic and social policies. Thus, the weakening of democracy can be associated with the breaking of the founding social contract of the welfare state and the delegation of important economic decisions to politically irresponsible actors. With the convergence of these two tendencies, a regime emerges where the will of the majority has little or no influence on substantive decisions related to economic governance.The fact remains that while the concept of liberal democracy presents specificities in these two fields, the political and the institutional, on the one hand, and the economic and the social, on the other, the concept of liberal democracy refers to a Western system in which political, economic and social issues have been combined, democratic principles being corrected, or supplemented, by mechanisms for guaranteeing individual freedoms, and economic liberalism being corrected by social requirements. It is the balance between these requirements, if ever existed, that is today called into question and threatened.This book raises an important question: can we believe in a regeneration of liberal democracy?About the editorsBertrand Mathieu is Professor at the Law School of the Sorbonne-University, Past Senior member of the Council of State (S.E.), Emeritus President of the French Association of Constitutional Law, and member of the Venice Commission (Council of Europe). He is the author of Justice et politique : la déchirure ? (Lextenso 2015) ; Le droit contre la démocratie ? (Lextenso, 2017) (traduction en hongrois, 2018, en espagnol 2021, en russe, 2021, en anglais, Law versus Democracy ? editions EPLO 2023) ; et Droit constitutionnel et institutions politiques (LGDJ 2022).George Katrougalos is Professor of Public Law at Democritus University of Greece, former Minister of Foreign Affairs (2019), State Minister for European Affairs (2016-2018), Minister of Labour and Social Solidarity (2015-2016) and State Minister for Administrative Reforms of Greece (2015). He is also the Vice President of the International Association of Constitutional Law. He has published extensively in Greek, American, European and Asian legal reviews on comparative constitutional law, social rights, democracy and neoliberalism and he has taught at several universities in Europe, Asia and the Americas. List of RapporteursWith a General Report by Bertrand Mathieu (Sorbonne – Université Paris 1, France) and George Katrougalos (Democritus University, Greece), and Special Reports by Maurice Adams (Tilburg University, the Netherlands), Astrid Cerón-Padilla (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Efren Chavez-Hernandez (National Autonomous University of Mexico), Kenny Chng (Singapore Management University, Singapore), Lóránt Csink (Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary), Maartje De Visser (Singapore Management University, Singapore), Tímea Drinóczi (Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil), Marcelo Figueiredo (Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil), Maaike Geuens (Tilburg University, the Netherlands), Juan Carlos Henao (Universidad Externado de Colombia), Kevin Fredy Hinterberger (Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour, Austria), Konrad Lachmayer (Sigmund Freud University, Austria), César Landa (Université Pontificale Catholique du Pérou), Andreas Marcou (University of Central Lancashire, Cyprus), Tatiana S. Maslovskaya (Université d’Etat biélorusse, Biélorussie), Luca Mezzetti (University of Bologna, Italy), Mo Jihong (Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, China), Nikolaos Paraskevopoulos (University of Thessaloniki, Greece), Marie-Odile Peyroux-Sissoko (Université de Franche-Comté, France), Ricardo Ramirez-Calvo (Universidad de San Andrés, Argentina), Jana Reschová (Charles University of Prague, Czech Republic), Mathias Revon (Aix-Marseille Université, France), Alejandra Rodríguez Galán (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina), Bianca Selejan-Gutan (‘Lucian Blaga’ University of Sibiu, Romania), Patrick Taillon (Université Laval, Canada), Elena-Simina Tănăsescu (University of Bucharest, Romania), László Trócsányi (Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church of Hungary) and Tomasz Tulejski (University of Lodz, Poland), and a foreword by Prokopios Pavlopoulos (Former President of the Hellenic Republic).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0170.008
Open science0.0030.011
Research integrity0.0060.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch portal (Tilburg University)Same topicAdvanced Frequency and Time StandardsFrench-language works237,207