Modélisation de la gestion de l'information dans une perspective ouverte : le cas d'une université québécoise en transformation numérique
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With the advent of open governance, aiming to redefine power relations between publicinstitutions and their users by using information technologies, universities shoulddemonstrate greater openness towards their communities. This openness has variousimplications at the operational, political, and technological levels. At the operational level,openness translates IT use to improve service quality and disseminate online recordedinformation about universities’ activities. Politically speaking, openness encouragestransparency and collegiality practices. At the technological level, it is about disclosing datain an open technological form for reuse. The availability of the right recorded information atthe right time and for the right actor is therefore necessary. This can only be achieved byimplementing strategies that allow universities to optimize the management of their recordedinformation in an open perspective. This translates the open archival approach, whichinvolves three categories of actors, namely officers (professors and directors), experts(archivists, communicators, IT specialists, data analysts, and librarians) and users (students,administrative staff, journalists, partners, etc.). These actors have various expectationstowards information, which means that their actions are to be regulated by governancemechanisms giving each of them legitimacy in this context of openness.This interdisciplinary and exploratory-descriptive study aims to model recorded informationmanagement from an open perspective, using documentary information generated as partof communication activities as the object of modelling. This model, developed from a culturalmediation perspective, focuses on the tagging of interactions by rules and thecharacterization of interdependencies between officers, experts and users. The aim is tostudy the rules that frame the actions of these actors, namely those governing theircompliance, performance and identity. These are related, respectively, to the university'sidentity as an institution, an organization and a community, and refer to the online availabilityof recorded information reflecting, respectively, transparency and the exercise of power,organizational performance and community involvement A simple case study will be used to model recorded information management from an openperspective. The case study is represented by Université Laval, which has developed adigital transformation strategy to support its teaching, research and administrative activities,as well as its community services. Data collection aims to identify, through semi-structuredinterviews (individual and focus groups) and the selection of relevant documentationaccessible on the university's websites, the actors involved in recorded informationmanagement, their rules and the contexts influencing their application. It also aims to mapout the means of cultural mediation that could be put in place to encourage better applicationof these rules. These empirical data are complemented by those obtained through an onlinesurvey in order to identify these actors’ perceptions towards the management of thisrecorded information, the rules and constraints of their application, and the importance theyattach to cultural mediation.The results of this research contribute to the advancement of knowledge on the study ofrecorded information management in the current context of digital transformation, bydescribing the interactions between the actors involved. In practical terms, the modeldeveloped as a result of this research will serve as an opening project management tool foruniversities undergoing digital transformation. By mapping out the interactions between thevarious actors, it will help these establishments strike the right balance between the ambitions of openness and the constraints that surround it, while rationally stimulating theuse value of documentary information.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».