OPTIMAL HOME OXYGEN FLOW RATE FOR INFANTS WITH BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
INTRODUCTION:\nBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is one of the most common morbidities related to preterm birth. Infants with moderate BPD are discharged on supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-96%, avoiding both hypoxia and hyperoxia, each with its own morbidity. Pulse oximetry (POX) is used to measure oxygenation in the blood. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a potential method to measure cerebral oxygenation and brain perfusion. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of normalized data for NIRS values in neonate infants going home with or without oxygen. We proposed that with combination of NIRS and pulse oximetry we could better identify a safe oxygen flow rate/concentration for babies with BPD. In doing so, we also sought to determine what the normative values of NIRS are in premature infants. \nMETHODS: \nThis was a prospective cohort study approved by the Bioethics Board, University of Saskatchewan. Infants were recruited from the NICU, Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital after obtaining written informed consent. One group (Control group, n=22) of relatively healthy preterm infants were recruited for NIRS measurements in relation to standard POX. We then compared NIRS and POX values on varying flow rates (0.03, 0.06, 0.12 L/Min) for moderate BPD infants going on home oxygen (n=10). \nRESULTS: \nOf the control infants in room air, the average POX value was 97.8% with SD ± 1.661 and SEM ± 0.006. The average time of hypoxia with POX below 90% was 3.5%, while time above 96% was 96.5%. The average NIRS value was 78.24% with SD ± 7.705 and SEM ± 0.027. The NIRS values for this group showed time at <60% was 1.4% of the time, 60%-80% was 50.75% and >80% was 47.9%. As expected, the difference of means between POX and NIRS (POX – NIRS) was 19.56% with the 95% confidence interval of 19.503 to 19.61. Cohen's correlation coefficient was 0.02 between the two variables Pulse Oximetry and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. One-sided and two-sided p-tests values were 0.00.\nFor the group on oxygen, at the flow rate of 0.03 lpm the average time with POX <90% was 2.35%, with 90-96% was 15.52% and with > 96% was 82.13 %. Time for this group with NIRS values <60% were 0.01%, 60%-80% were 58.5% and > 80% were 41.5%. At oxygen flow rate of 0.06 lpm, the average time with POX <90% was 1.43%, 90-96% was 6.08% and > 96% was 92.49%. Time for this group with NIRS values <60% was 0.6%, 60%-80% was 65% and > 80% was 34.4%. At oxygen flow rate of 0.12 lpm, the average time with POX <90% was 1.46%, 90-96% was 11.54% and > 96% was 87.00%. Time for this flow rate with NIRS values <60% was 0.2%, 60%-80% was 64% and > 80% was 34.8%. Individually, we did not see POX desaturation events associate with NIRS desaturations.\nCONCLUSION: \nAs expected, there is an approximate difference of 19.5% between the POX and NIRS values with POX being higher that NIRS in healthy infants. Individually, we could not find any correlation between POX and NIRS values for hypoxia events. On average, we did not see a dose response correlation between oxygen flow rate and time spent in the hyperoxemic range across different flow rates by POX or cerebral NIRS. While NIRS could play an important adjunct role in the NICU for brain oxygen saturation, NIRS data cannot serve as a stand-alone monitoring tool.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».