MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7060864596

OPTIMAL HOME OXYGEN FLOW RATE FOR INFANTS WITH BRONCHOPULMONARY DYSPLASIA

2024· dissertation· en· W7060864596 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchopulmonary dysplasiaPulse oximetryOxygenationOxygen saturationCohortHypoxia (environmental)Oxygen deliveryProspective cohort study
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION:\nBronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is one of the most common morbidities related to preterm birth. Infants with moderate BPD are discharged on supplemental oxygen to maintain oxygen saturation between 90-96%, avoiding both hypoxia and hyperoxia, each with its own morbidity. Pulse oximetry (POX) is used to measure oxygenation in the blood. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a potential method to measure cerebral oxygenation and brain perfusion. To the best of our knowledge, there is a lack of normalized data for NIRS values in neonate infants going home with or without oxygen. We proposed that with combination of NIRS and pulse oximetry we could better identify a safe oxygen flow rate/concentration for babies with BPD. In doing so, we also sought to determine what the normative values of NIRS are in premature infants. \nMETHODS: \nThis was a prospective cohort study approved by the Bioethics Board, University of Saskatchewan. Infants were recruited from the NICU, Jim Pattison Children’s Hospital after obtaining written informed consent. One group (Control group, n=22) of relatively healthy preterm infants were recruited for NIRS measurements in relation to standard POX. We then compared NIRS and POX values on varying flow rates (0.03, 0.06, 0.12 L/Min) for moderate BPD infants going on home oxygen (n=10). \nRESULTS: \nOf the control infants in room air, the average POX value was 97.8% with SD ± 1.661 and SEM ± 0.006. The average time of hypoxia with POX below 90% was 3.5%, while time above 96% was 96.5%. The average NIRS value was 78.24% with SD ± 7.705 and SEM ± 0.027. The NIRS values for this group showed time at <60% was 1.4% of the time, 60%-80% was 50.75% and >80% was 47.9%. As expected, the difference of means between POX and NIRS (POX – NIRS) was 19.56% with the 95% confidence interval of 19.503 to 19.61. Cohen's correlation coefficient was 0.02 between the two variables Pulse Oximetry and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. One-sided and two-sided p-tests values were 0.00.\nFor the group on oxygen, at the flow rate of 0.03 lpm the average time with POX <90% was 2.35%, with 90-96% was 15.52% and with > 96% was 82.13 %. Time for this group with NIRS values <60% were 0.01%, 60%-80% were 58.5% and > 80% were 41.5%. At oxygen flow rate of 0.06 lpm, the average time with POX <90% was 1.43%, 90-96% was 6.08% and > 96% was 92.49%. Time for this group with NIRS values <60% was 0.6%, 60%-80% was 65% and > 80% was 34.4%. At oxygen flow rate of 0.12 lpm, the average time with POX <90% was 1.46%, 90-96% was 11.54% and > 96% was 87.00%. Time for this flow rate with NIRS values <60% was 0.2%, 60%-80% was 64% and > 80% was 34.8%. Individually, we did not see POX desaturation events associate with NIRS desaturations.\nCONCLUSION: \nAs expected, there is an approximate difference of 19.5% between the POX and NIRS values with POX being higher that NIRS in healthy infants. Individually, we could not find any correlation between POX and NIRS values for hypoxia events. On average, we did not see a dose response correlation between oxygen flow rate and time spent in the hyperoxemic range across different flow rates by POX or cerebral NIRS. While NIRS could play an important adjunct role in the NICU for brain oxygen saturation, NIRS data cannot serve as a stand-alone monitoring tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics ResearchFrench-language works237,207