PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DI KABUPATEN LAMONGAN Studi Kasus Desa Karangwedoro dan Desa Wangunrejo Kecamatan Turi Kabupaten Lamongan
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Fundamental change in the direct election is a logical consequence on development planning in an area. Elections are seen as a market of plan in which the prospective Head / Deputy Head of offer development programs to be executed when the later won. It was not unusual if elected to the Regional Head of reciprocation of political supporters. Public support for the figure who was later elected as the Regional Head of consequence to the birth of development policies that benefit the community of supporters. 1. How does the process of development planning in post-election Lamongan? 2. What factors influence the success of the proposed community in development planning? This study refers to the formulation of the problem and research objectives, the study was categorized as a type of qualitative descriptive study. In order to support the study, researchers took a more specific locus in two areas namely the Wangunrejo and Karangwedoro villages, sub-district Turi, Lamongan district. Post-election process of development planning in the district Lamongan, development planning meeting, better known by Musrenbang performed each year into the new fiscal year. Musrenbang District begins with musrenbang at village and district level further. At this stage, each district will implement the District Planning meetings, which will accommodate the aspirations of the people who proposed and accommodated through programs and activities undertaken by each of the villages concerned. Factors affecting the success of the proposed community development planning, at all levels Musrenbang process characterized by two conditions, namely accepted and rejected. If accepted then forwarded to the next hierarchy, but if rejected would be implemented in the year to wait for the next or may not be implemented at all, the Government only as a bridge for the prosperity of the people all of course tailored to your budget and needs. The planning process in local government elections held in post Lamongan integrated based on the concept defined. Planning itself is implemented in stages starting from the village level through village musrenbang, forwarded to the district of equated with SKPD forum and discussed in the produce district Musrenbang Government Work Plan (RKPD). The factors that influence the success of the proposed Community Development Planning in Lamongan divided into formal factor and informal factors. Formal factors include: the availability of development funds and urgent need for development. Being informal factors include: pressure / influence from members of the legislative proposals through Jatmas.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,048 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».