PERENCANAAN PEMBANGUNAN DI KABUPATEN LAMONGAN Studi Kasus Desa Karangwedoro dan Desa Wangunrejo Kecamatan Turi Kabupaten Lamongan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fundamental change in the direct election is a logical consequence on development planning in an area. Elections are seen as a market of plan in which the prospective Head / Deputy Head of offer development programs to be executed when the later won. It was not unusual if elected to the Regional Head of reciprocation of political supporters. Public support for the figure who was later elected as the Regional Head of consequence to the birth of development policies that benefit the community of supporters. 1. How does the process of development planning in post-election Lamongan? 2. What factors influence the success of the proposed community in development planning? This study refers to the formulation of the problem and research objectives, the study was categorized as a type of qualitative descriptive study. In order to support the study, researchers took a more specific locus in two areas namely the Wangunrejo and Karangwedoro villages, sub-district Turi, Lamongan district. Post-election process of development planning in the district Lamongan, development planning meeting, better known by Musrenbang performed each year into the new fiscal year. Musrenbang District begins with musrenbang at village and district level further. At this stage, each district will implement the District Planning meetings, which will accommodate the aspirations of the people who proposed and accommodated through programs and activities undertaken by each of the villages concerned. Factors affecting the success of the proposed community development planning, at all levels Musrenbang process characterized by two conditions, namely accepted and rejected. If accepted then forwarded to the next hierarchy, but if rejected would be implemented in the year to wait for the next or may not be implemented at all, the Government only as a bridge for the prosperity of the people all of course tailored to your budget and needs. The planning process in local government elections held in post Lamongan integrated based on the concept defined. Planning itself is implemented in stages starting from the village level through village musrenbang, forwarded to the district of equated with SKPD forum and discussed in the produce district Musrenbang Government Work Plan (RKPD). The factors that influence the success of the proposed Community Development Planning in Lamongan divided into formal factor and informal factors. Formal factors include: the availability of development funds and urgent need for development. Being informal factors include: pressure / influence from members of the legislative proposals through Jatmas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".