The present position and future prospects of the Grand trunk railway company of Canada.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
(jc (granir tank |lailfoag Cjompng of (taata.Various causes have recently brought this important under- taking prominently before the public.The depressed state of the share and debenture capital, and the inability of the Company to provide for the interest due upon a portion of their bonds, have caused a host of letters and leading articles to appear in the public press, some of them displaying an amount of political, geographical, nautical, and commercial ignorance of British North America, which is quite distracting.Answers would be thrown away upon many of them ; nevertheless, some of the absurd statements and propositions ought not to go forth to the public unanswered.One writer thinks that conclusions drawn by individuals having proved fallacious, is a reason why the Canadian Government ought to give a guarantee; another describes Portland as in Canada ; another, to use a simile, would subsidize a line of mail steamers between St. Katheriue's Docks and Antwerp, but not between Dover and Calais ; another complains of the management, because they will not give the United States Railways what in justice they have no right to ask for, and which they can only otherwise obtain by ruining themselves.The sooner the hope of obtaining a guarantee from the Canadian Government is dispelled the better ; the proposition is utterly impracticable ; and the sooner the competing lines in the United States confine themselves to their natural and legitimate boundaries, the less fear there will be of their falling 1 19774 into the hands of a receiver of the Court of Chancery, and the more hope there will be of those that are already in getting out.The limited connection already existing between the Canadian Government and the railways of that province, have not been found to give satisfaction.It has for years been the bane of Canadian politics, not that there was any truth in ministers becoming suddenly rich, but the patronage which it placed in their hands excited the jealousy of their political opponents, and as some of those opponents had a paper of their own, the most ridiculous charges have been heralded forth with a pertinacity which became contagious, and w T as caught up and repeated even by a portion of the press of this country.Mr. Buchanan, the President of the United States, in his last annual message, recommending the completion of railway communication to the Pacific, said, " I repeat the opinion contained " in my last annual message, that it would be inexpedient for " the government to undertake this great work by agents of its " own appointment and under its direct and exclusive control." This would increase the patronage of the Executive to a " dangerous extent, and would foster a system of jobbery and " corruption which no vigilance on the part of the Federal " officers could prevent.The construction of this road ought " therefore to be entrusted to incorporated companies or 14 agencies, who would exercise that active and vigilant super- " vision over it which can be inspired alone by a sense of 44 corporate and individual interest."The same argument applies with equal force to Canada and the other British North American provinces.A remedy for the present position of the Grand Trunk Railway must be sought for elsewhere, and by other means.To know the disease is half the cure : we will endeavour to point it out and the remedy will at once become apparent.British North America, within the influence of the Grand Trunk Railway, contains about 500,000 square miles, with natural advantages and resources sufficient to make up an empire equal to Russia.It is capable of giving agricultural employment to, and sustaining a population equal to that of the half of Europe.Its internal navigation is unparalleled in the world.The Grand Trunk Railway, commencing at River du Loup, in the Gulf of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».