The present position and future prospects of the Grand trunk railway company of Canada.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(jc (granir tank |lailfoag Cjompng of (taata.Various causes have recently brought this important under- taking prominently before the public.The depressed state of the share and debenture capital, and the inability of the Company to provide for the interest due upon a portion of their bonds, have caused a host of letters and leading articles to appear in the public press, some of them displaying an amount of political, geographical, nautical, and commercial ignorance of British North America, which is quite distracting.Answers would be thrown away upon many of them ; nevertheless, some of the absurd statements and propositions ought not to go forth to the public unanswered.One writer thinks that conclusions drawn by individuals having proved fallacious, is a reason why the Canadian Government ought to give a guarantee; another describes Portland as in Canada ; another, to use a simile, would subsidize a line of mail steamers between St. Katheriue's Docks and Antwerp, but not between Dover and Calais ; another complains of the management, because they will not give the United States Railways what in justice they have no right to ask for, and which they can only otherwise obtain by ruining themselves.The sooner the hope of obtaining a guarantee from the Canadian Government is dispelled the better ; the proposition is utterly impracticable ; and the sooner the competing lines in the United States confine themselves to their natural and legitimate boundaries, the less fear there will be of their falling 1 19774 into the hands of a receiver of the Court of Chancery, and the more hope there will be of those that are already in getting out.The limited connection already existing between the Canadian Government and the railways of that province, have not been found to give satisfaction.It has for years been the bane of Canadian politics, not that there was any truth in ministers becoming suddenly rich, but the patronage which it placed in their hands excited the jealousy of their political opponents, and as some of those opponents had a paper of their own, the most ridiculous charges have been heralded forth with a pertinacity which became contagious, and w T as caught up and repeated even by a portion of the press of this country.Mr. Buchanan, the President of the United States, in his last annual message, recommending the completion of railway communication to the Pacific, said, " I repeat the opinion contained " in my last annual message, that it would be inexpedient for " the government to undertake this great work by agents of its " own appointment and under its direct and exclusive control." This would increase the patronage of the Executive to a " dangerous extent, and would foster a system of jobbery and " corruption which no vigilance on the part of the Federal " officers could prevent.The construction of this road ought " therefore to be entrusted to incorporated companies or 14 agencies, who would exercise that active and vigilant super- " vision over it which can be inspired alone by a sense of 44 corporate and individual interest."The same argument applies with equal force to Canada and the other British North American provinces.A remedy for the present position of the Grand Trunk Railway must be sought for elsewhere, and by other means.To know the disease is half the cure : we will endeavour to point it out and the remedy will at once become apparent.British North America, within the influence of the Grand Trunk Railway, contains about 500,000 square miles, with natural advantages and resources sufficient to make up an empire equal to Russia.It is capable of giving agricultural employment to, and sustaining a population equal to that of the half of Europe.Its internal navigation is unparalleled in the world.The Grand Trunk Railway, commencing at River du Loup, in the Gulf of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".