Rabies management in the North, a one health problem in a systems theory framework
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Rabies is a significant public health concern and is often described as the quintessential One Health problem, linking especially animal health to human health.I examine how rabies is managed in the circumpolar North with three cases: Alaska, Northwest Territories, and Svalbard.In this thesis, I describe rabies management in the North using a systems theory framework and explore challenges in this limited application of the One Health paradigm, focusing on animal and human health agencies and their interaction in rabies management in a northern environment.I conducted semi-structured interviews with fifteen key informants.My results indicate that most respondents characterize the working relationships between agencies as positive and that the approach to rabies management is highly collaborative.While rabies is managed at the territorial or state level in the Northwest Territories and Alaska, respectively, the perception of where authority lies in rabies management is less evident in Norway concerning Svalbard, owing to the unusual administrative structure of the archipelago.Some uncertainty also existed among Canadian rabies managers.Respondents generally describe working relationships between agencies as positive; however, coordination remains one of the main challenges to rabies management, along with harsh environmental conditions and the remoteness of the small communities.Rabies managers in Svalbard also face risks associated with hunting, whereas dogs present challenges to rabies management in Alaska and the Northwest Territories, owing to limited veterinary services in dispersed small and remote communities in these two regions.My research shows that poor collaboration between agencies can hinder effective disease management, even for a disease such as rabies, with a long history of control measures in animals (vaccination) to reduce human exposure to this zoonotic virus.These findings could guide the implementation of the full One Health paradigm by highlighting the need for collaborative interagency relationships and consideration of local conditions when developing One Health based approaches.scientist as a graduate student in a social science program.Especially Mary Ehrlander, who stuck with me even into her retirement, has guided me to better understand the intellectual power of social sciences and the importance of telling a story.I appreciate the insight Mary, Elaine Drew, and Brandon Boylan have provided insights and support throughout the last six years of my journey into qualitative research and the social sciences.I have a much better understanding of this branch of science because of their guidance.My colleagues in rabies management and research who participated in the interviews provided the basis for my M.A. thesis; I appreciate their collaborative spirit in indulging me in my pursuit of their insight and in sharing their experiences.My wife Laurie has
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle