MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7061796693

Rabies management in the North, a one health problem in a systems theory framework

2024· dissertation· en· W7061796693 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarWorks - UA (University of Alaska System) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle accelerators and beam dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealthcare systemSystems analysisSystems theoryHealth careRabiesPublic health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rabies is a significant public health concern and is often described as the quintessential One Health problem, linking especially animal health to human health.I examine how rabies is managed in the circumpolar North with three cases: Alaska, Northwest Territories, and Svalbard.In this thesis, I describe rabies management in the North using a systems theory framework and explore challenges in this limited application of the One Health paradigm, focusing on animal and human health agencies and their interaction in rabies management in a northern environment.I conducted semi-structured interviews with fifteen key informants.My results indicate that most respondents characterize the working relationships between agencies as positive and that the approach to rabies management is highly collaborative.While rabies is managed at the territorial or state level in the Northwest Territories and Alaska, respectively, the perception of where authority lies in rabies management is less evident in Norway concerning Svalbard, owing to the unusual administrative structure of the archipelago.Some uncertainty also existed among Canadian rabies managers.Respondents generally describe working relationships between agencies as positive; however, coordination remains one of the main challenges to rabies management, along with harsh environmental conditions and the remoteness of the small communities.Rabies managers in Svalbard also face risks associated with hunting, whereas dogs present challenges to rabies management in Alaska and the Northwest Territories, owing to limited veterinary services in dispersed small and remote communities in these two regions.My research shows that poor collaboration between agencies can hinder effective disease management, even for a disease such as rabies, with a long history of control measures in animals (vaccination) to reduce human exposure to this zoonotic virus.These findings could guide the implementation of the full One Health paradigm by highlighting the need for collaborative interagency relationships and consideration of local conditions when developing One Health based approaches.scientist as a graduate student in a social science program.Especially Mary Ehrlander, who stuck with me even into her retirement, has guided me to better understand the intellectual power of social sciences and the importance of telling a story.I appreciate the insight Mary, Elaine Drew, and Brandon Boylan have provided insights and support throughout the last six years of my journey into qualitative research and the social sciences.I have a much better understanding of this branch of science because of their guidance.My colleagues in rabies management and research who participated in the interviews provided the basis for my M.A. thesis; I appreciate their collaborative spirit in indulging me in my pursuit of their insight and in sharing their experiences.My wife Laurie has

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it