Scooting around town: Determinants of shared electric scooter use in Washington D.C.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Personal vehicle use in North America causes a wide variety of negative externalities, although it is nonetheless still the predominant mode of transport in the region.As a result, North American cities are working to support and encourage active transport, including public transit, cycling, and walking.Privately run shared-electric-scooters (e-scooters) have rapidly grown in popularity in the United States since their launching in 2017.E-scooters are marketed as an environmentally friendly solution for various transport issues.For example, as an alternative to private vehicle short distance trips, and a solution for first-mile and last-mile to reach public transit.Furthermore, some cities in the U.S. view e-scooters as having the potential to support their transport goals, and even create pilot programs for the mode to exist legally in their cities.Yet, they have vague regulations that do not maximize the potential use of e-scooters.This thesis investigates the impact of temporal, weather, sociodemographic, land use, and transport infrastructure on e-scooter presence and variation of e-scooter presence, as well as trip distance and frequency.The research is based on publicly available data, and thus contributes a framework for studying e-scooters in North American cities that engineers, policymakers, and researchers can use to understand determinants of e-scooter use.The findings from the studies indicate that escooters are available near bicycle lanes, and that the central business district (CBD) has a significant impact on e-scooter presence.The research suggests that e-scooter trips that start or end near bicycle lanes are longer than the average e-scooter trip, as are e-scooter trips with metro stations near their destination.them, academic and otherwise, that will stay with me after graduation.I would also like to extend a special thanks to Ahmed for introducing me to the field of transport planning, which has become a passion and will guide how I seek to make a difference in the world.Thank you to Boer Cui for helping me with Chapter 2, who I also learned a great deal from!I am especially grateful for Boer's help with generating the multi-level mixed effects regression models and interpreting and discussing their results.Thank you more generally to the Transport Research at McGill (TRAM) team for being a sounding board for questions and ideas about everything from research to lunch and everything in between.Thank you also to my dear friends,
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle